green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.0 score
“it is well settled that it is not a per se violation of the antitrust laws for a manufacturer or supplier to agree with a distributor to give him an exclusive franchise, even if this means cutting off another distributor (citing cases).”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
(2×)
it is well settled that it is not a per se violation of the antitrust laws for a manufacturer or supplier to agree with a distributor to give him an exclusive franchise, even if this means cutting off another distributor (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pete Wilson, Governor Californians for Senator Pete Wilson Leo McCarthy McCarthy for U.S. Senator v. A. H. Belo Corp. Kxtv Great Western Broadcasting Corporation Channel 40 Licensee Renaissance Communications Corp. Fidelity Television CBS Christ Craft Industries Inc. Nbc Subsidiary Inc. Knbc Tv Nbc Inc. Ktla Inc. Chronicle Broadcasting of San Francisco Inc. Kron Tv Ktvu Inc. Cox Enterprises McGraw Broadcasting Company Inc. Kgtv San Joaquin Communications Corp. Ksee Meredith Broadcasting Inc. Kmst Retlaw Broadcasting Ktxl, Krbk Koplar Communications of California Koplar Communications Inc. Kcbc National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Kjeo Kget Acerkley Communications, Inc., Pete Wilson v. A.H. Belo Corp.
See New York State Broadcasters Ass'n v. United States, 414 F.2d 990, 994 (2nd Cir.1969) (FCC declaratory ruling was reviewable "as in the case of other orders" by the court of appeals under 47 U.S.C. § 402 (a)) (citing Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 , 372 n. 3, 89 S.Ct. 1794 , 1797 n. 3, 23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969)), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1061 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); North Carolina Util.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. A. H. Belo Corp.
See New York State Broadcasters Ass’n v. United States, 414 F.2d 990, 994 (2nd Cir.1969) (FCC declaratory ruling was reviewable “as in the case of other orders” by the court of appeals under 47 U.S.C. § 402 (a)) (citing Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 , 372 n. 3, 89 S.Ct. 1794 , 1797 n. 3, 23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969)), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1061 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); North Carolina Util.
discussed
Cited "see"
Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren
See New York State Broadcasters Ass'n v. United States, 414 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1061 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); Banzhaf v. Federal Communications Commission, 132 U.S.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren
See New York State Broadcasters Ass’n v. United States, 414 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1061 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970); Banzhaf v. Federal Communications Commission, 132 U.S.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Broadcasting Company v. Mitchell
See, New York State Broadcasters Association v. United States, 414 F.2d 990 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1061 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969), upholding the ban on broadcast media of lottery information, 18 U.S.C. § 1034 . .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edge Broadcasting Co. v. United States
See also New York State Broadcasters Ass’n, Inc. v. United States, 414 F.2d 990, 996 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1061 , 90 S.Ct. 752 , 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New York State Broadcasters Assn., Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 820.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 2, 1970.
396 U.S. 1061
Robert A. Dreyer for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Henry Getter, John H. Conlin, and Lenore G. Ehrig for the United States et al. George S. Pappagianis, Attorney General, for the State of New Hampshire as amicus curiae in support of the petition.
Are, Black, Granted, Should.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.