green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1989 ·
…the supreme court long ago held that congress has plenary power to prohibit foreign importations including narcotics.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
O'BRIEN v. Trevethan
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
But see In re Garland, 428 F.2d 1185 (1st Cir. 1970), cert denied 402 U.S. 966 , 91 S.Ct. 1624 , 29 L.Ed.2d 130 (1971).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arjay Associates, Inc. v. Bush
the supreme court long ago held that congress has plenary power to prohibit foreign importations including narcotics.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arjay Associates, Inc. v. Bush
the supreme court long ago held that congress has plenary power to prohibit foreign importations including narcotics.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Smith v. Edmiston
And the cost of being unsuccessful is dearly high—loss of the companionship of one’s children. 402 U.S. at page 959, 91 S.Ct. at page 1627.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pullarao Pentapati
See Daut v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 405 F.2d 312 , cert, denied, 402 U.S. 945 , 91 S.Ct. 1624 , 29 L.Ed.2d 114 ; Pineda v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 393 F.2d 139 , cert, denied, 392 U.S. 943 , 88 S.Ct. 2327 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1405 ; United States v. Morello, 2 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 631 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Kras
(2×)
See In re Garland, 428 F.2d 1185 (1st Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 954 , 91 S.Ct. 1624 , 29 L.Ed.2d 124 (1971) ; In Matter of Smith, 323 F.Supp. 1082 (D.Colo.1971) ; A. Richard Partilla, Bankruptcy No. 71-B-380 (S.D.N.Y., pending before Referee Babitt). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lu v. Ravida (In Re Ravida)
United States v. Kras, 409 U.S. 434 , 93 S.Ct. 631 , 34 L.Ed.2d 626 (1973); see also In re Garland, 428 F.2d 1185, 1187 (1st Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 966 , 91 S.Ct. 1624 , 29 L.Ed.2d 107 (1971) (requiring payment of fees in order to obtain discharge not a violation of due process); In re Red Barn, 23 B.R. 593 (Bankr.D.Me.1982) (requiring payment of fee to file a complaint for relief from stay does not violate any fundamental right).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daut
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 5021.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1971.
Cited by 55 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.