green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 449 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.1971), rev’d on other grounds, 409 U.S. 363 , 93 S.Ct. 647 , 34 L.Ed.2d 577 (1973). 7 Congress has not yet provided that prejudgment interest can be awarded as a mat ter of course to private litigants in antitrust suits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
See Aloha, 776 F.2d at 815 n. 2 6 We first considered the omitted case doctrine in Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., 430 F.2d 994 (9th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colonial Bank v. McLeod (In re McLeod)
See United States for the Use & Benefit of D’Agostino Excavators, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co., Inc., 430 F.2d 1077, 1086 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971) citing, Davidson v. Bridgeport 8 Conn., 472 (1831).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Louis, 721 F.2d 254, 256 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 928 , 104 S.Ct. 1712 , 80 L.Ed.2d 185 (1984), and are designed to vindicate “substantial rights intended by Congress to be judicially enforced.” Gonzalez, 773 F.2d at 643 (emphasis added); accord Railway Labor Executives Association v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 430 F.2d 994, 997 (9th Cir.1970) (“Where ... the dispute grows out of the employment relationship and ... involves an attempt to impose a right which is incident to that relationship, the statutory forum is the [NRAB], absent a clear expression of legis…
cited
Cited "see"
Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co.
See *1166 Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ambromovage v. United Mine Workers
See United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077 , 1081 n. 1 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021, 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 426 F.2d 709, 715 (5th Cir.1970); 3 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Napolean S. Ambromovage, Lewis Kurtz, Frank Tragus, John Brinkash, Alex Gonzales, Emmett Thomas, Nicholas J. Haydock, John D. Jillson, Joseph Fauzio, and Frank J. Galgay, Trustees of the Anthracite Health and Welfare Fund v. United Mine Workers of America, an Unincorporated Trade Union Association, Appeal of Napolean S. Ambromovage Napolean S. Ambromovage, Lewis Kurtz, Frank Tragus, John Brinkash, Alex Gonzales, Emmett Thomas, Nicholas J. Haydock, John D. Jillson, Joseph Fauzio, and Frank J. Galgay, Trustees of the Anthracite Health and Welfare Fund v. United Mine Workers of America, an Unincorporated Trade Union Association, Appeal of United Mine Workers of America, an Unincorporated Trade Union Association
See United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077 , 1081 n. 1 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 426 F.2d 709, 715 (5th Cir.1970); 3 J.
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 879 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 584, 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence Medley
See United States ex rel. *219 D’Agostino Excavators, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077 , 1083 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independence Tube Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant v. Copperweld Corporation and Regal Tube Company, Defendants-Counterplaintiffs v. David F. Grohne, Counterdefendant
See Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp., 633 F.2d 477, 484 (7th Cir. 1980) and Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 , both cases in which we followed the Supreme Court's lead. 37 As already mentioned, Judge Will was more cautious in instructing the jury, however (Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.
See Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp., 633 F.2d 477, 484 (7th Cir. 1980) and Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 880 (7th Cir. 1970), certiorari denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 , both cases in which we followed the Supreme Court’s lead. 37 As already mentioned, Judge Will was more cautious in instructing the jury, however (Indep.
cited
Cited "see"
Lafayette Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Accord, Locklin v. DayGlo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873, 879 (7th Cir. 1970), cert, den., 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallace & Wallace Fuel Oil Co.
See United States Use of D’Agostino Excavators, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077, 1081 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alton Wayne Moore
See United States v. Barnes, 431 F.2d 878 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1024 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 637 (1970); Wilburn v. United States, 326 F.2d 903, 904 (5th Cir. 1964); cf. Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180, 182 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) (same transaction may be charged under two statutes if each offense requires proof of a fact that the other does not).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elliott v. Roach
See generally 20001 Inc. v. Novaglas Corp., (E.D.N.Y.1973) 60 F.R.D. 649 , where it is stated “pendent jurisdiction should be freely exercised to deal with non-federal, permissive counterclaims, where convenient and in the interest of judicial economy.” Id. at 650 (citing United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., (2d Cir. 1970 Friendly, J., concurring) 430 F.2d 1077 , 1089, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971)).
cited
Cited "see"
Meinrath v. Singer Co.
See United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077 , 1087 (2d Cir. 1970) (Friendly, J., concurring), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Calvin R. Hopkins v. George P. Baker
(2×)
See United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077 , 1083 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Larson v. General Motors Corp., 148 F.2d 319, 322 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 745 , 66 S.Ct. 34 , 90 L.Ed. 445 (1945). * Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 292 (d) 1 Art. 25, § 13, District of Columbia Police Regulations 2 There is uncontroverted evidence in the record that the Regulation had been violated 3 Tr. 425-27 4 The trial court refused Penn Central's proposed jury instruction regarding negligence per se, hence the appli…
cited
Cited "see"
Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc. v. Gross
See United States v. Heyward-Robinson Company, 430 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Data Digests, Inc. v. Standard & Poor's Corp.
See Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp., 392 U.S. 134, 147 , 88 S.Ct. 1981 , 20 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968) (Fortas, J., concurring). . 15 U.S.C. § 15 ; see generally Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Bergen Drug Co. v. Parke, Davis & Co., 307 F.2d 725, 727-728 (3d Cir. 1962); Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 214 F.2d 891, 893-894 (5th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 912 , 75 S.Ct. 292 , 99 L.Ed. 715 (1955); S. Oppenheim & G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
See, e.g., Locklin v. Day Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 388 F.2d 25 (7th Cir.1967) aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 395 U.S. 100 , 89 S.Ct. 1562 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969); Dairy Foods, Inc. v. Dairy Maid Products Co-operative, 297 F.2d 805 (7th Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City Of Mishawaka, Indiana v. American Electric Power Company, Inc.
See also Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 , 878 & n. 13 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corp., Inc., 388 F.2d 25, 35 (7th Cir. 1967), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 395 U.S. 100 , 89 S.Ct. 1562 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969). 54 Similarly, in this case, the trial court found that the municipalities had no choice but to file an administrative action before the commission to prevent the loss of their wholesale power source and to establish their right to equal treatment with the utility's retail …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Mishawaka v. American Electric Power Co.
See also Locklin v. DayGlo Color Corp., 429 F.2d 873 , 878 & n. 13 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971); Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corp., Inc., 388 F.2d 25, 35 (7th Cir. 1967), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 395 U.S. 100 , 89 S.Ct. 1562 , 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re I/s Stavborg (O. H. Meling, Manager) v. National Metal Converters, Inc.
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Heyward-Robinson Co., 430 F.2d 1077 , 1080 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1021 , 91 S.Ct. 582 , 27 L.Ed.2d 632 (1971). 6 As this court stated in Verley, 477 F.2d at 210 , the language of9 U.S.C. 9 is quite specific in requiring an agreement by the parties to entry of judgment by a federal court before a federal court has jurisdiction to do so; section 9 states that a federal district court may confirm an artiration award 'If the parties in their agreement have agreed that a judgment of the court shall be entered upon the award made pursuant to the arbitration…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hawkins
v.
General Motors Corp.
v.
General Motors Corp.
No. 873.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1971.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.