green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Cited for
If a grand jury is prejudiced by outside sources when in fact there is sufficient evidence to indict, the greatest safeguard to the liberty of the accused is the petit jury and the rules governing its determination of a defendant’s guilt or innocence
- United States v. Red Elk, 955 F. Supp. 1170 (D.S.D. 1997).published(If a grand jury is prejudiced by outside sources when in fact there is sufficient evidence to indict, the greatest safeguard to the liberty of the accused is the petit jury and the rules governing its determination of…)
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1984).published (If a grand jury is prejudiced by outside sources when in fact there is insufficient evidence to indict, the greatest safeguard to the liberty of the accused is the petit jury and the rules governing its determination o…)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“if a grand jury is prejudiced by outside sources when in fact there is sufficient evidence to indict, the greatest safeguard to the liberty of the accused is the petit jury and the rules governing its determination of a defendant's guilt or innocence”
- United States v. Red Elk, 955 F. Supp. 1170 (D.S.D. 1997).published“if a grand jury is prejudiced by outside sources when in fact there is sufficient evidence to indict, the greatest safeguard to the liberty of the accused is the petit jury and the rules governing its determination of a…”
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 719 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1984).published “if a grand jury is prejudiced by outside sources when in fact there is insufficient evidence to indict, the greatest safeguard to the liberty of the accused is the petit jury and the rules governing its determination of…”
Other citing cases
- Waldorf v. Shuta, 3 F.3d 705 (3d Cir. 1993).published
- United States v. Hueftle, 687 F.2d 1305 (10th Cir. 1982).published
- United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of Am. v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases), 543 F.2d 1333 (D.C. Cir. 1976).published
- Langella v. Com'r of Corr., 413 F. Supp. 1214 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).published
- United States v. Robert Wyler, 487 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1973).published
- United States v. McDonald, 740 F. Supp. 757 (D. Alaska 1990).published
- United States v. McKinley, 15 M.J. 731 (1982).published
- United States v. Edward P. Gullion, Jr., 575 F.2d 26 (1st Cir. 1978).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Silverthorne
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 6059.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1971.
Published opinion
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · D. South Dakota (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.