green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Naum Brothers, Inc.
See Landis Tool Co., Division of Litton Industries v. N.L.R.B., 460 F.2d 23 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 915 , 93 S.Ct. 237 , 34 L.Ed.2d 177 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Hedstrom Company, a Subsidiary of Brown Group, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, Landis Tool Co., Division of Litton Industries v. NLRB, 460 F.2d 23, 24-25 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 915 , 93 S.Ct. 237 , 34 L.Ed.2d 177 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dominick Romano
See Romano v. United States, 460 F.2d 1198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 915 , 93 S.Ct. 237 , 34 L.Ed.2d 177 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. Carson
See also Kisley v. City of Falls Church, 409 U.S. 907 , 93 S.Ct. 237 , 34 L.Ed.2d 169 (1972), dismissing for want of substantial federal question 212 Va. 693 , 187 S.E.2d 168 ; Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo, 524 F.2d 571 (3d Cir. 1975); United Health Clubs of America v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761 (D.S.C. 1976) (three-judge court); Brown v. Haner, 410 F.Supp. 399 (W.D.Va.1976); Rogers v. Miller, 401 F.Supp. 826 (E.D.Va.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cullinane v. Geisha House, Inc.
In several cases where the Supreme Court has dismissed for want of a substantial federal question the jurisdictional statements presented to the Court contained between them all the issues we have here; see, e.g., Smith v. Keator, 419 U.S. 1043 , 95 S.Ct. 613 , 42 L.Ed.2d 636 (1974) 6 (Exhibit A to appellants’ motion for summary reversal in the instant case), Rubenstein v. Cherry Hill, 417 U.S. 963 , 94 S.Ct. 3165 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1136 (1974) 7 (Exhibit C to appellants’ motion for summary reversal in the instant case), and Kisley v. City of Falls Church, 409 U.S. 907 , 93 S.Ct. 237 , 34 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Solomon
v.
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
v.
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
No. 72-204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1972.
Certiorari, Consideration, Took.
Published
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.