green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robinson v. Neil
In determining the identity of the offenses for the purpose of establishing double jeopardy, two tests have been utilized by the courts — the “same transaction” test and the “same evidence test.” Justice Brennan has stated the “same transaction” test as follows: “In my view, the Double Jeopardy Clause requires the prosecution, except in most limited circumstances, to join at one trial all the charges against a defendant that grow out of a single criminal act, occurrence, episode, or transaction.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 453-454 90 S.Ct. 1189 . 25 L.Ed.2d 469, 481 (197…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bear Enterprises v. County of Greenville
See Golden v. Planning Bd. of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y. (2d) 359, 334 N.Y.S. (2d) 138, 285 N.E. (2d) 291, 63 A.L.R. (3d) 1157 (1972), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed. (2d) 294 (1972) (ordinance limiting the use of property will not be held unconstitutional unless it is shown to be unreasonable in terms of necessity or to have caused such a diminution in value as to be tantamount to confiscation).
examined
Cited "see"
Ritter v. Board of Commissioners
(3×)
Group Health Coop. v. King County Medical Soc'y, 39 Wn.2d 586, 669 , 237 P.2d 737 (1951); see Rao v. Board of County Comm'rs, 80 Wn.2d 695, 698 , 497 P.2d 591 (dictum), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1017 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marriage of K. B. v. S. B.
See, Loeser v. Loeser, (1974) 160 Ind.App. 236 , 311 N.E.2d 636 , trans. den., cert. den. 419 U.S. 1122 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed.2d 299 (1975); Scott, supra. We do not, however, agree that Dr. Hull’s testimony should have been excluded because his report had been attached to S.B.’s motion for new trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Kb v. Sb
See, Loeser v. Loeser, (1974) 160 Ind. App. 236 , 311 N.E.2d 636 , trans. den., cert. den. 419 U.S. 1122 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed.2d 299 (1975); Scott, supra .
cited
Cited "see"
Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of Madison
See Golden v. Ramapo Planning Bd., 30 N.Y. 2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S. 2d 138 , 285 N.E. 2d 291 (Ct. App. 1972), appeal dismissed 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 294 (1972); Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County, a California Nonprofit Corporation v. The City of Petaluma, a California Charter City
See, e. g., Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y.2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S.2d 138 , 285 N.E.2d 291 , appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972); National Land & Investment Co. v. Kohn, 419 Pa. 504 , 215 A.2d 597 (1965); Note, Phased Zoning: Regulation of the Tempo and Sequence of Land Development, 26 Stan.L.Rev. 585, 605 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
So. Burl. Cty. NAACP v. Tp. of Mt. Laurel
(2×)
See, e.g., Golden v. Ramapo Planning Board, 30 N.Y. 2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S. 2 d 138, 285 N.E. 2d 291 (1972), appeal dismissed 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972); Construction Industry Ass'n of Sonoma County v. Petaluma, 375 F. Supp. 574 (N.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rao
v.
Board of County Commissioners (Pierce County)
v.
Board of County Commissioners (Pierce County)
No. 72-345.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1972.
Cited by 17 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.