green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“the district court correctly exercised its discretion to issue an injunction properly tailored so as to keep interference with business at a minimum compatible with full compliance with the law.”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rogers v. 66-36 Yellowstone Blvd. Cooperative Owners, Inc.
the district court correctly exercised its discretion to issue an injunction properly tailored so as to keep interference with business at a minimum compatible with full compliance with the law.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garden Homes Management, Corp.
See United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 474 F.2d 115, 122-23 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 (1973) (noting that the Government has standing to sue when a pattern or practice exists). 7 To establish a pattern or practice, the Government must do more than submit proof of discrimination.
discussed
Cited "see"
South-Suburban Housing Center v. Greater South Suburban Board of Realtors
See, U.S. v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 474 F.2d 115, 122 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 (1973) (“ ‘[The words “for profit”] ... were evidently included in § 3604(e) to distinguish and eliminate from the operation of that subsection statements made in social, political or other contexts, as distinguished from a commercial context, where the person making the representations hopes to obtain some financial gain as a result of the representations.’ ”) (quoting U.S. v. Mintzes, 304 F.Supp. 1305, 1312 (D.Md.1969)). b.
discussed
Cited "see"
Steptoe v. Beverly Area Planning Ass'n
Second, § 3604(e) — the "antiblockbusting" provision — makes it unlawful "[f]or profit, to induce or attempt to induce any person to sell or rent any dwelling by representations regarding the entry or prospective entry into the neighborhood of a person or persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (e) (emphasis added); see abo United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 474 F.2d 115, 119 (5th Cir.) ("Blockbusting has been described as a process through which individuals stimulate and prey'... on racial bigotry and fear by initiating and en…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dallas County Commission
(2×)
See U.S. v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 474 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 (1973). 57 The question of the Commission's responsiveness is more complex. 58 Roads: A great portion of the trial concerned testimony about paving and maintenance of roads.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Housing Authority of City of Chickasaw
United States v. Northside Realty Associates, 474 F.2d 1164, 1168 (5th Cir. 1973), after remand, 501 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1974), rehearing denied, 518 F.2d 884 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 977 , 96 S.Ct. 1483 , 47 L.Ed.2d 747 (1976); see United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty Co., 474 F.2d 115, 125 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 (1973) (construction of § 3613). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peni Nitz v. Darrell Nitz
It is apparent that the bankruptcy judge based significant findings on evidence presented at the trial before him which was not made a part of the appellate record before the district judge, and is not before us. 5 Upon examination of the record and relevant Utah law, we conclude that the district court had no adequate basis to reject the bankruptcy judge’s findings and should have accepted them. 6 Rachback v. Cogswell, 547 F.2d 502, 504 (10th Cir.); see United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty, 474 F.2d 115, 126 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Babin
See e.g., United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 474 F.2d 115, 120-21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 (1973); United States v. Hunter, 459 F.2d 205, 214-25 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 934 , 93 S.Ct. 235 , 34 L.Ed.2d 189 (1972); United States v. Parma, 661 F.2d 562, 573 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1972 , 72 L.Ed.2d 441 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northside Realty Associates, Inc. v. United States
See also United States v. Mitchell, N.D.Ga., 1971, 335 F.Supp. 1004, 1006 , Aff'd sub nom., United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 5 Cir., 474 F.2d 115 , Cert. denied, 1973, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 . 17 Testers And The Fourth Amendment 26 We also reject the defendants' contention that the District Court should have excluded the evidence obtained by "testers," individuals who posed as prospective home buyers in order to investigate possible violations of the Fair Housing Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northside Realty Associates, Inc. v. United States
See also United States v. Mitchell, N.D.Ga., 1971, 335 F.Supp. 1004, 1006 , aff’d sub nom., United States v. Bob Lawrence Realty, Inc., 5 Cir., 474 F.2d 115 , cert. denied, 1973, 414 U.S. 826 , 94 S.Ct. 131 , 38 L.Ed.2d 59 . 17 Testers And The Fourth Amendment We also reject the defendants’ contention that the District Court should have excluded the evidence obtained by “testers,” individuals who posed as prospective home buyers in order to investigate possible violations of the Fair Housing Act.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Porth
v.
Warden, North Carolina State Penitentiary
v.
Warden, North Carolina State Penitentiary
No. 72-1580.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.