Edwin Clay & Arthur John Sweeney, Jr. v. United States, 419 U.S. 937 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Edwin Clay & Arthur John Sweeney, Jr. v. United States, 419 U.S. 937 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Sierra-Garcia (nyed, 1991-03-18) · Strongest negative: United States v. Jose Javier Valencia and Ivan Dario Martinez-Valencia (ca7, 1990-07-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
examined Cited "but see" United States v. Jose Javier Valencia and Ivan Dario Martinez-Valencia (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
7th Cir. · 1990 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Clay, 495 F.2d 700, 707 (7th Cir.) (holding that the district court did not have to draw explicitly the distinction between preparation and attempt, but also commenting that the defendants "were entitled to have the question of an attempt ... submitted to the jury with appropriate instructions covering whether the conduct of the men had reached the point where an overt act directly tending to effect the commission of the substantive offense ... and strongly corroborative of criminal purpose ... had been committed”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 937 , 95 S.Ct. 207 , 42 L.Ed…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sierra-Garcia
E.D.N.Y · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Clay, 495 F.2d 700 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 937 , 95 S.Ct. 207 , 42 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974).
Edwin Clay and Arthur John Sweeney, Jr.
v.
United States
73-6623.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1974.
419 U.S. 937
Published

419 U.S. 937

95 S.Ct. 207

42 L.Ed.2d 164

Edwin CLAY and Arthur John Sweeney, Jr., petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 73-6623.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 21, 1974

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

1

Denied.

2

Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari.

3

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice STEWART join.

4

Separate dissenting statement by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS.