green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“there appears to be little doubt that under the statute jury verdicts for the plaintiff can be sustained upon evidence which would not be sufficient in the ordinary negligence action”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
there appears to be little doubt that under the statute jury verdicts for the plaintiff can be sustained upon evidence which would not be sufficient in the ordinary negligence action
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Warledo, Johnson Warledo, Thomas Lee Ahaisse, Gary Larney and Meredith Malcolm Quinn
See U.S. v. Amato, 495 F.2d 545, 549-50 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 333 , 42 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Hassell, United States of America v. Kenneth McIntosh United States of America v. Robert McIntosh
See United States v. Amato, 495 F.2d 545, 550 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 333 , 42 L.Ed.2d 286 (1974); Miller v. United States, 382 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 984 , 88 S.Ct. 1108 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1285 , rehearing denied, 391 U.S. 971 , 88 S.Ct. 2037 , 20 L.Ed.2d 888 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKeown v. Woods Hole
Bonura v. Sea Land Service, Inc., 505 F.2d 665, 668-669 (5th Cir.1974) (“Third Circuit seems to stand alone in making either expert, actuarial evidence concerning the present value of future loss or mathematical guidance ... [a] prerequisite to the submission of loss of future wages to the jury”); accord Worden v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, 689 F.Supp. 35, 37-38 (D.Mass.1988) (rejecting argument that the plaintiff failed to come forward with expert or other evidence of calculating reduction of future earning capacity to present value in FELA case); see also Heater v. Chesapeake and Ohi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William J. Welsh, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern, Inc., Employee Benefits Plan, Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See, e.g., Heater v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co., 497 F.2d 1243, 1247 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 333 , 42 L.Ed.2d 287 (1974) (plaintiff's heart attack after operation on plaintiff's back was compensable as caused by plaintiff's back injury); Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. Conley, 293 F.2d 612, 613 (10th Cir.1961) (plaintiff's death from pneumonia consequent to infection from tooth jarred loose during operation on plaintiff's back was compensable as caused by plaintiff's back injury); and Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Justis, 232 F.2d 267, 27…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dale v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
(2×)
See also, Heater v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 497 F.2d 1243 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1013 , 95 S.Ct. 333 , 42 L.Ed.2d 287 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simon
v.
Dixon
v.
Dixon
No. 74-240.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.