green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Neal v. Coleburn
See Commonwealth of Virginia v. United States, 386 F.Supp. 1319 (D.D.C.1974) (three-judge court), aff'd 420 U.S. 901 , 95 S.Ct. 820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 833 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boyer
See also State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), 768 So.2d 542 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 946 , 121 S.Ct. 345 , 148 L.Ed.2d 277 (2000). | ¡^Furthermore, as noted above, as set forth in La.Code Crim.P. art. 858, “[n]either the appellate nor supervisory jurisdiction of the supreme court may be invoked to review the granting or the refusal to grant a new trial, except for error of law.” See State v. Gilbert, 286 So.2d 345 (La.1973), ce rt. dismissed, 420 U.S. 902 , 95 S.Ct. 820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. District of Columbia
See Willis v. Fournier, 418 F.Supp. 265, 267 (M.D.Ga.), aff’d, 537 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir. 1976); Beall v. Kearney & Trecker Corp., 350 F.Supp. 978, 981 (D.Md.1972); see also North Central Truck Lines v. United States, 381 F.Supp. 1217, 1220 (W.D.Mo.1974), aff’d, 420 U.S. 901 , 95 S.Ct. 820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1975). 4 The plaintiffs here were not prejudiced by the defendants’ failure to amend their answer to include the collateral estoppel defense.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fehr v. McHugh
Judgments § 11, at 35 (1947) (footnote omitted); see also Commonwealth of Virginia v. United States, 386 F.Supp. 1319 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d, 420 U.S. 901 , 95 S.Ct. 820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 833 (1975), the validity and finality of an action must ultimately be determined in accordance with the laws of the state where it was originally brought.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gilbert
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 73-5804.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1975.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. dismissed for want of substantial federal[*903] question. See Daniel v. Louisiana, ante, p. 31.