Beaton v. Judges of Land Court, 423 U.S. 806 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Beaton v. Judges of Land Court, 423 U.S. 806 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alejandro Campos Jr. v. City of Fullerton (cacd, 2025-02-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alejandro Campos Jr. v. City of Fullerton
C.D. Cal. · 2025 · confidence medium
Aff’d, 426 U.S. 394 , 96 S. Ct. 16 3229, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976).
cited Cited "see" Wells Fargo Fin. Mass., Inc. v. Mulvey
Mass. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beaton v. Land Ct ., 367 Mass. 385 , 392, 326 N.E.2d 302 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 806 , 96 S.Ct. 16 , 46 L.Ed.2d 27 (1975).
cited Cited "see" In Re Tricca
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Corp. (In re Hall), 188 B.R. 476, 482 (Bankr.D.Mass. 1995); see Beaton v. Land Court, 367 Mass. 385, 393 , 326 N.E.2d 302, 307 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 806 , 96 S.Ct. 16 , 46 L.Ed.2d 27 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Morse v. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Whitman
D. Mass. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
While plaintiffs’ theory that this was an abuse of process must fail because foreclosure by statutory power of sale does not involve sufficient “legal process,” Jones v. Brockton Public Markets, Inc., 1975, 369 Mass. 387 , 340 N.E.2d 484 ; see Beaton v. Land Court, 1975, 367 Mass. 385 , 326 N.E.2d 302 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 806 , 96 S.Ct. 16 , 46 L.Ed.2d 27 , they have made out an action in tort for wrongful foreclosure.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gerard Fredrick Lisk, Jr.
7th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 , 493 n. 4, 96 S.Ct. 16 , 46, 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (Powell, J., concurring).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Beaton v. Land Court, 367 Mass. 385 , 326 N.E.2d 302, 307 (1975) (noting that "a court acting under general principles of equily jurisprudence' has broad power to reform, rescind, or cancel written instruments, including mortgages,” and that the discharging party could simply have brought suit to compel the mortgagee to cancel the note and "issue a discharge of mortgage in a form appropriate for recording”), appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 806 , 96 S.Ct. 16 , 46 L.Ed.2d 27 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beaton et ux.
v.
Judges of the Land Court
No. 75-34.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
423 U.S. 806
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Appeal from Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.