green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Rice
Rather, it is designed to assure that the lawyer “may work with a certain degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion *472 by opposing parties and their counsel.” United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 237, 95 S.Ct. 2160, 2169 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141, 150 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Borough of Seaside Park v. Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Education
See Robinson v. Cahill, 69 N.J. 133 , cert. denied sub nom Klein v. Robinson, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S. Ct. 217 , 46 L.
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky May Coal Company, Inc.
See N.L.R.B. v. Decaturville Sportswear Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 788 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Babbitt
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1024 (4th Cir.) (in reviewing agency action under the APA, "the focal point for judicial review should be the administrative record already in existence, not some new record made initially in the reviewing court." (quoting Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1244 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam))), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975); Lewis, 998 F.2d at 882 ("Judicial review under these standards is generally based on the administrative record that was before the agency at the tim…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc. v. Babbitt
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1024 (4th Cir.) (in reviewing agency action under the APA, “the focal point for judicial review should be the administrative record already in existence, not some new record made initially in the reviewing court.” (quoting Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1244 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam))), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975); Lewis, 998 F.2d at 882 (“Judicial review under these standards is generally based on the administrative record that was before the agency at t…
discussed
Cited "see"
The Continuum Company, Inc. v. Incepts, Inc., Abs Ventures Ii, and Aba Excelsior II
Continuum Co., Inc. v. Incepts, Inc., 873 F.2d 801, 804 (5th Cir.1989). 4 .F.R.C.P. 53; see NLRB v. Decaturville Sportswear Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 788, 789-90 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975). 5 .See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1352 , 1450.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Marsh
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1025 (4th Cir.) (suggesting that a review limited to the form of an EIS is inadequate under NEPA), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 *557 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See DeFillipo v. Ford Motor Corp., 516 F.2d 1313, 1318 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert M. Mowbray and Rose A. Mowbray v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc. And Michael French
See Diematic Manufacturing Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc., 516 F.2d 975, 978 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Wallace v. Norman Industries, Inc., 467 F.2d 824, 827 (5th Cir.1972); American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spartan Grain & Mill Company, Cross-Appellee v. Virgil Ayers, W.C. Meaders, Jr., Boyce Blackmon, and Joe Acker, Cross-Appellants
(2×)
Since judgment should have been entered for Spartan, the producers’ attorney’s fees award must be reversed. 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 ; See De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313, 1321 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
University of Maryland v. Cleland
See Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1024 (4th Cir.), cert. den., 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Harvey v. Marlene Industries Corp.
See NLRB v. Decaturville Sportswear Co., 518 F.2d 788 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of Madison
(2×)
See Robinson v. Cahill, 67 N.J. 333, 369-370 (1975) (Pashman, J., concurring in part and dissenting), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stauble v. Warrob, Inc.
Compare, e.g., Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Bldg., Inc., 737 F.2d 698, 712-13 (7th Cir.) (if objection had been preserved, the court “might well [have] reverse[d]" reference of summary judgment proceedings to a master), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 432 , 83 L.Ed.2d 359 (1984) with, e.g., Sims Consol., Ltd. v. Irrigation Power Equip., Inc., 518 F.2d 413, 417 (10th Cir.) (suggesting that it would have been proper to refer the case to a master for trial because of the great distance the witnesses had travelled), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 218 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alfred Stauble, Individually and F/u/b Warrob, Inc. v. Warrob, Inc., Alfred Stauble, Individually and F/u/b Montechusetts Leasing Corp. v. Montechusetts Leasing Corp.
Compare, e.g., Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Bldg., Inc., 737 F.2d 698, 712-13 (7th Cir.) (if objection had been preserved, the court "might well [have] reverse[d]" reference of summary judgment proceedings to a master), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 432 , 83 L.Ed.2d 359 (1984) with, e.g., Sims Consol., Ltd. v. Irrigation Power Equip., Inc., 518 F.2d 413, 417 (10th Cir.) (suggesting that it would have been proper to refer the case to a master for trial because of the great distance the witnesses had travelled), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 218 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morales v. County of Hudson
The Commissioner, DOC and plaintiffs contend that the trial judge has the power to make such a direction to implement a remedy following the declaration of unconstitutional conditions at the Hudson County Jail, citing Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed. 2d 447 (1979) and Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed. 2d 522 (1978), reh'g den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1979); see also Robinson v. Cahill, 69 N.J. 133, 153 (1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 141 (1975), 69 N.J. 449 (1976), 70 N.J. 155 (1976), injuncti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jo-Ann, Inc. v. Alfin Fragrances, Inc.
(2×)
Co., 571 S.W.2d 640, 642 (Ky.App.1978); see, e.g., DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3rd Cir.) (interpreting the Pennsylvania version of the code), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); and Cavalier Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Liberty Homes, Inc., 53 Md.App. 379, 394 , 454 A.2d 367 (1983), as well as Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 594 F.2d 129, 134 (1979) (Wisdom, J.) (applying Iowa law) (citing Rockwell Eng’g Co. v. Automatic Timing & Controls Co., 559 F.2d 460 (7th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 938 , 100 S.Ct. 288 , 62 L.Ed.2d 198 (1979)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bascom Food Products Corp. v. Reese Finer Foods, Inc.
(2×)
They have not been saved by allegations that they were reasonable in the specific circumstances, nor by a failure to show that they “fixed or regulated prices, parcelled out or limited production, or brought about a deterioration in quality.” Id. at 212, 79 S.Ct. at 709; see also DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975) (defining a per se illegal group boycott as one in which there is a “purpose either to exclude a person or group from the market, or to accomplish some other anticompetitive objective, or both.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patten Securities Corp., Inc. v. Diamond Greyhound & Genetics, Inc.
See, e.g., Diematic Manufacturing Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc., 516 F.2d 975, 978 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Wallace v. Norman Industries, Inc., 467 F.2d 824, 827 (5th Cir.1972); American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J.P.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whitmer v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.
(2×)
Compare Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting Corp., supra, 451 Pa. at 422-424 , 305 A.2d at 696 , and DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313, 1322-23 (3rd Cir.1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements Litigation
(2×)
See also, DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc., Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc., Florida Computer Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Diematic Manufacturing Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc., 516 F.2d 975, 978 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Wallace v. Norman Industries, Inc., 467 F.2d 824, 827 (5th Cir.1972); American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J.P.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Diematic Manufacturing Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc., 516 F.2d 975, 978 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 217 , 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Wallace v. Norman Industries, Inc., 467 F.2d 824, 827 (5th Cir.1972); American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J.P.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dorothy R. Garber
(2×)
See, e. g., Haverly v. United States, 513 F.2d 224 (7th Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Timothy W. Swain and Katherine A. Swain v. Claude S. Brinegar, Individually and as Secretary of Transportation for the United States
(2×)
This aspect of the EIS therefore meets the standards set forth in Sierra Club v. Froehlke, 486 F.2d 946, 952-953 (7th Cir. 1973); see also Fayetteville Area Chamber of Commerce v. Volpe, 515 F.2d 1021, 1027-1028 (4th Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 216 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 ; Daly v. Volpe, 514 F.2d 1106, 1111-1112 (9th Cir. 1975); Iowa Citizens for Environmental Quality, Inc. v. Volpe, 487 F.2d 849, 851-853 (8th Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harte
v.
Lehnhausen, Former Director, Department of Local Government Affairs of Illinois
v.
Lehnhausen, Former Director, Department of Local Government Affairs of Illinois
No. 75-253.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1975.
Cited by 126 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.