green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…rule 60(b)(5) does not apply where a case relied on as precedent by the court in rendering the present judgment has since been reversed.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Curl v. Curl
(2×)
rule 60(b)(5) does not apply where a case relied on as precedent by the court in rendering the present judgment has since been reversed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Annie Martinez, A/K/A Annie Griego, and Gloria Dominguez-Williams
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
if the evidence on the issue is conflicting, the issue of entrapment should be submitted to the jury.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nash County Board Of Education v. The Biltmore Company
... a consent judgment does have res judicata effect ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.
... a consent judgment does have res judicata effect . . .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony F. Gomez
See United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 23 , cert. den., 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (10 Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milford Burkley, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 25 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); United States v. Gardner, 516 F.2d 334, 347-48 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 861 , 96 S.Ct. 118 , 46 L.Ed.2d 89 (1975); United States v. Pena-Ozuna, 511 F.2d 1106, 1107-08 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 850 , 96 S.Ct. 92 , 46 L.Ed.2d 73 (1975); United States v. Pollard, 483 F.2d 929, 932 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1137 , 94 S.Ct. 882 , 38 L.Ed.2d 762 (1974); United States v. Watson, 489 F.2d 504, 506 (3rd Cir. 1973). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & Pollok
See Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F.2d 634 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); see also Clark & Co., Inc. v. Acheson Indus., Inc., 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richards v. Read
See, e. g., Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976), and cases cited, 532 F.2d at 848 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 46
"This is so because the entry of a consent judgment is an exercise of judicial power ... that is entitled to appropriate respect and because of the policy favoring finality of judgments." Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F.2d 634 , 639 (2d Cir.1987) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied sub nom Rothenberg v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); see also Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, Inc., 532 F.2d 846, 848 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976). 54 The record is clear that Local 46…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 46, Metallic Lathers Union & Reinforcing Iron Workers of New York & Vicinity of the International Ass'n of Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers
“This is so because the entry of a consent judgment is an exercise of judicial power ... that is entitled to appropriate respect and because of the policy favoring finality of judgments.” Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F.2d 634 , 639 (2d Cir.1987) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied sub nom Rothenberg v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); see also Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, Inc., 532 F.2d 846, 848 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sullivan
Ortiz, 804 F.2d at 1165 (citing United States v. Smegal, 772 F.2d 659, 660 (10th Cir.1985)); see also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 25 (10th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Martinez v. United States, 373 F.2d 810, 812 (10th Cir.1967) 19 Only Russell and Mary Sullivan were charged in Count 5 (possession of an unregistered firearm) and neither defendant points to any evidence of entrapment with respect to that count 20 In particular, the government informants testified that the defendants had been actively involved in the manufacture of amphe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sullivan
Ortiz, 804 F.2d at 1165 (citing United States v. Smegal, 772 F.2d 659, 660 (10th Cir.1985)); see also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 25 (10th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Martinez v. United States, 373 F.2d 810, 812 (10th Cir.1967). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Lee Spencer v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Respondent
(2×)
See, e.g., Tennon v. State, 235 Ga. 594 , 220 S.E.2d 914 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976), Sanders v. State, 235 Ga. 425 , 219 S.E.2d 768 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Holsey v. State, 235 Ga. 270 , 219 S.E.2d 374 (1975); Young v. State, 232 Ga. 285 , 206 S.E.2d 439 (1974); Williams v. State, 232 Ga. 203 , 206 S.E.2d 37 (1974); Simmons v. State, 226 Ga. 110 , 172 S.E.2d 680 (1970); Miller v. State, 224 Ga. 627 , 163 S.E.2d 730 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. R. C. French
United States v. Shaw, 570 F.2d 770, 772 (8th Cir. 1978); see also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 23 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corporation
(2×)
See also Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Ind., Inc., 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Aro Co. v. Allied Witan Co., 531 F.2d 1368 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 862 , 97 S.Ct. 165 , 50 L.Ed.2d 140 (1976); Langsam, supra. The strong public interest in achieving finality in litigation is advanced by giving res judicata effect to consent decrees.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, a New York Corporation v. United Control Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and Uc Liquidating Corporation, a Washington Corporation, Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, a New York Corporation v. United Control Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and Uc Liquidating Corporation, a Washington Corporation
See, e. g., Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976), and cases cited, 532 F.2d at 848 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. United Control Corp.
See, e. g., Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976), and cases cited, 532 F.2d at 848 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry Andrew Swets and Gary Christopher Weeks
See also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 975 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jonathan Townsend
(2×)
See also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20 (10th Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wallace Clark & Co., Inc.
v.
Acheson Industries, Inc.
v.
Acheson Industries, Inc.
No. 75-1434.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
425 U.S. 976
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.