green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Cook v. Babbitt
In some extraordinary instances the members might be called to the stand to testify concerning the purpose of the official action____ Id. at 267-68 , 96 S.Ct. at 564-65 (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Arthur Gibbons, A/K/A \Joe Gibbons
(2×)
There is no indication that the Judge would have refused to explore possible racial prejudice or other bias, provided questions could have been posed which would have avoided disclosure of the jurors' residences, or the possibility of a strong indication of residence. 4 Rather, the defendants do not appear to have urged a general inquiry into any particular prejudice, either by suggesting, for example, that the case had racial overtones, See Ham, supra, or by requesting "appropriate questions designed to identify racial prejudice," Ristaino, supra, 424 U.S. at 597 n.9, 96 S.Ct. at 1022 (dictum…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James P. McNeill
See United States v. Turcotte, 515 F.2d 145, 151 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975). 1 Appellant relies on Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967), to support his contention that he was denied due process and compulsory process by the exclusion of his witnesses’ testimony relating to Anthony’s solicitation of them.
cited
Cited "see"
Blankenship v. State
See United States v. Muckenstrum, 5th Cir., 515 F.2d 568 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David B. Charnay, Chester C. Davis and Robert A. Maheu
See United States v. Brandenfels, 522 F.2d 1259, 1262-63 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billy Wayne Waldrop v. Ronald E. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 570-71 (5th Cir.) (criticizing instruction that defined “reasonable doubt” as one that “must be substantial” and more than “a mere possible doubt”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975); Bryant v. State, 348 So.2d 1136, 1138 (Ala.Crim.App.) (rejecting attack on instruction defining “reasonable doubt” as a “real and substantial doubt”), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldrop v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 570-71 (5th Cir.) (criticizing instruction that defined "reasonable doubt" as one that "must be substantial" and more than "a mere possible doubt"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S. Ct. 564 (1975); Bryant v. State, 348 So. 2d 1136, 1138 (Ala. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldrop v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 570-71 (5th Cir.) (criticizing instruction that defined "reasonable doubt" as one that "must be substantial" and more than "a mere possible doubt"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 746 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975); Bryant v. State, 348 So.2d 1136, 1138 (Ala.Crim.App.) (rejecting attack on instruction defining "reasonable doubt" as a "real and substantial doubt"), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salley
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 571 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975); United States v. Christy, 444 F.2d 448, 450 (C.A.6), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 293 , 30 L.Ed .2d 266 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tsoumas v. State of New Hampshire
Cupp v. Naughten, supra; see also United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 571 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gerry
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-398.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1975.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.