green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
2.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1978 ·
…it has not been contended that the question is one upon which federal courts must look to state law.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
New Jersey Education Association v. Fred G. Burke
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
it has not been contended that the question is one upon which federal courts must look to state law.
discussed
Cited "but see"
New Jersey Education Ass'n v. Burke
it has not been contended that the question is one upon which federal courts must look to state law.
cited
Cited "see"
Bailey v. Internal Revenue Service
See Scoggin v. Schrunk, 522 F.2d 436, 437 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1066 , 96 S.Ct. 807 , 46 L.Ed.2d 657 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schiavulli v. Aubin
See Ramirez Pluguez v. Cole, 571 F.2d at 71 ; accord Scoggin v. Schrunk, 522 F.2d 436, 437 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1066 , 96 S.Ct. 807 , 46 L.Ed.2d 657 (1975); Spence v. Latting, 512 F.2d 93, 98 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 896 , 96 S.Ct. 198 , 46 L.Ed.2d 129 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eusebia Fernandez Etc. v. Honorable Jose Trias Monge Etc.
Accord Scoggin v. Schrunk, 522 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 1066 , 96 S.Ct. 807 , 46 L.Ed.2d 657 (1976); Spence v. Latting, 512 F.2d 93, 98 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 896 , 96 S.Ct. 198 , 46 L.Ed.2d 129 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Accord, Scoggin v. Schrunk, 522 F.2d 436, 437 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1066 , 96 S.Ct. 807 , 46 L.Ed.2d 657 (1976) (prior judgment “serves not only to bar every claim that was raised in state court but also to preclude the assertion of every legal theory or ground for recovery that might have been raised in support of the granting of the desired relief.”); cf. Restatement of Judgments § 61(1) (Tent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Scheve
Accord, Scoggin v. Schrunk, 344 F.Supp. 463 (D.Ore.1971), rev’d on other grounds, 622 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1066 , 96 S.Ct. 807 , 46 L.Ed.2d 657 (1976); Johnson v. Hock, 19 Ariz.App. 283 , 506 P.2d 1068 (1973); Laz v. Southwestern Land Co., 97 Ariz. 69 , 397 P.2d 52 (1964) (en banc); Chapin v. Aylward, 204 Kan. 448 , 464 P.2d 177 (1970); Pierce v. Bd. of County Comm’rs of Leavenworth County, 200 Kan. 74 , 434 P.2d 858 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scoggin
v.
Schrunk, Mayor of Portland, Oregon
v.
Schrunk, Mayor of Portland, Oregon
No. 75-5761.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1976.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.