green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 10×
14.0 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 6 distinct cases, last quoted 2004 ·
…just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 47 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Evans
just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Evans
just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Evans
just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Evans
just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Evans
just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Evans
just as non-indians may continue to take advantage of improvements in fishing techniques, the treaty tribes may, in exercising their rights to take anadromous fish, utilize improvements in traditional fishing methods, such for example as nylon nets and steel hooks.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Garnett Johnnie Jones
(2×)
the law in this jurisdiction is that jurors must be excused for cause if their experience or that of their close relatives is such as to indicate the probability of partiality.
cited
Cited "see"
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Fish & Game Commission
See United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 686 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Fish & Game Commission, Idaho
See United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 686 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Parravano v. Babbitt
See United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 687 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass’n v. U.S. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Lee Matthews and Robert G. Prater
See United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1352-53 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Bailleaux, 685 F.2d 1105, 1113 (9th Cir.1982) (custody requirement satisfied when tape was in possession of FBI).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. United States
See United States v. Caldwell, 178 U.S.App.D.C. 20, 40 , 543 F.2d 1333, 1353 (1974) (no prejudice because defense counsel was made aware of statements at pretrial hearing), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Scafe, 822 F.2d 928, 936 (10th Cir.1987) (no prejudice because defendant was aware of statement before taking the stand); United States v. Heath, 580 F.2d 1011, 1021 (10th Cir.1978) (same), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 850 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William Verity
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Washington, 759 F.2d 1353, 1355 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc). 2 The Columbia River harvest is allocated under a similar arrangement overseen by the Oregon district court.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenn I. Wright, United States of America v. Dennis Moss
See United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1360 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Caldwell, 178 U.S.App.D.C. 20 , 32 & n. 42, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1345 & n. 42 (1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Bryant, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 72 , 76-77, 471 F.2d 1040, 1044-45 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1112 , 93 S.Ct. 923 , 34 L.Ed.2d 693 (1973). .
cited
Cited "see"
Bailey v. State
See United States v. Caldwell, D.C.Cir., 543 F.2d 1333 (1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Makah Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant v. State of Washington
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312, 363 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976) (the Boldt Decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. State
See United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1364-65 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Del Toro, 426 F.2d 181, 184 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 829 , 91 S.Ct. 58 , 27 L.Ed.2d 60 (1970); Commonwealth v. Ferreira, 373 Mass. 116 , 364 N.E.2d 1264, 1270 (Mass.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington State Charterboat Association v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974) (“final” decision) (Boldt, J.), aff’d, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Washington, 459 F.Supp. 1020, 1020-1130 (W.D.Wash.1974-1978) (post-trial decisions), various appeals dismissed, 573 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir.1978), 573 F.2d 1118 (9th Cir.1978), 573 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir.1978), various appeals aff’d sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. State of Washington
See, United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 , 419 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd 520 F.2d 676 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Washington
See, United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 , 419 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff’d 520 F.2d 676 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Stamper v. Baskerville
See United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1360 (D.C.Cir.1974) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Heinlein, 490 F.2d 725, 737 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas Andretta
United States v. Grassi, 602 F.2d 1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1979) (“A cold stipulation can deprive a party ‘of the legitimate moral force of his evidence,’ 9 Wigmore on Evidence § 2591 at 589 (3d ed. 1940), and can never fully substitute for tangible, physical evidence or the testimony of witnesses.”); accord, United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1359 n.134 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Washington
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff’d, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Puget Sound Gillnetters Association v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, United States of America, Real Parties in Interest. Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union, Inc., Petitioners v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, and United States of America, Real Parties in Interest-Appellees. United States of America v. State of Washington
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F.Supp. 899 (D.Or.1969); United States v. Oregon, 529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff’d, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F.Supp. 899 (D.Or.1969); United States v. Oregon, 529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. State of Washington
See United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cree v. Waterbury
See Declaration of William *421 Yallup, attached to Plaintiffs’ Local Rule 56 Statement of Material Pacts Regarding the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Treaty Claims (Ct.Rec. 164); see also, United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312, 380 (W.D.Wash.1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (Judge Boldt described the Yakamas as a “food gathering culture” which existed on such resources as game and fish and which traveled extensively not only to fish for their own consumption but also to communicate and trad…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Washington
See also United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676 , 685-86 and n. 3 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976) affirming Judge Boldt’s decision in 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974), which held that the determination of the number of fish available for harvest must be based solely on resource conservation needs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob Borg
United States v. Le Pera, 443 F.2d 810, 812 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971); see also United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1347 (D.C.Cir.1974) (refusing to presume biased a policeman’s relative), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Mikus v. United States, 433 F.2d 719, 723-24 (2d Cir.1970) (in criminal trial, juror former police officer).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago
See, e.g., United States v. State of Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 687 (9th Cir.1975) (reviewing district court’s apportionment of fishing rights which federal government had promised to Indians in treaties), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Sohappy, Sr., United States of America v. David Sohappy, Sr.
See, e.g., United States v. State of Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 686 (9th Cir.1975) (“These tribes have the power to regulate their own members and to arrest violators ... at usual and accustomed fishing sites.”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Settler v. Lameer, 507 F.2d 231 (9th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oregon
United States v. Washington, 759 F.2d 1353, 1357 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc) (per curiam) (“If the State acts for the primary purpose or object of affecting or regulating the fish supply or catch in noncompliance with the treaty as interpreted by past decisions, it will be subject to immediate correction and remedial action by the courts.”); see also United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 687 (9th Cir.1975) (district court has great amount of discretion as court of equity to devise details of an apportionment to protect interests of all parties), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State Of Oregon
United States v. Washington, 759 F.2d 1353, 1357 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc) (per curiam) ("If the State acts for the primary purpose or object of affecting or regulating the fish supply or catch in noncompliance with the treaty as interpreted by past decisions, it will be subject to immediate correction and remedial action by the courts."); see also United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 687 (9th Cir.1975) (district court has great amount of discretion as court of equity to devise details of an apportionment to protect interests of all parties), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Gibilaro v. Eugene Le Fevre
See, e.g., United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1360-62 (D.C.Cir. 1974) , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Brown, 456 F.2d 293, 295 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 684 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Beckett
See, e.g., United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333 (D.C.Cir.1974), *822 cer t. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); Jordan v. State, 247 Ga. 328 , 276 S.E.2d 224 (1981); State v. Heald, 443 A.2d 954 (Me.1982); Commonwealth v. Wilborne, 382 Mass. 241 , 415 N.E.2d 192 (1981); State v. Ternes, 259 N.W.2d 296 (N.D.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 1524 , 55 L.Ed.2d 540 (1978); State v. Van Dam, 554 P.2d 1324 (Utah 1976); Annot., 72 A.L.R.3d 895 (1976). 3 Generally speaking, a potential juror closely related by blood or marriage to either the prosecuting or defen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Landry
See, e.g., United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1352-53 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975) (letter written by defendant to third person which was subsequently turned over to the police: court refuses to limit language of rule because “fundamental fairness” dictates “granting the accused equal access to his own words, no matter how the government came by them”); United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2, 24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082 , 100 S.Ct. 1037 , 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980) (government seeks to use letter written by defendant prior …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harris
See, e.g., United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1347 n.57 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Bentley, 503 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. LePera, 443 F.2d 810, 812 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 958 , 92 S.Ct. 326 , 30 L.Ed.2d 275 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rubin KREMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
See, e. g., United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1369 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976) (on petition for rehearing); United States v. Inmon, 594 F.2d 352, 354 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 121 , 62 L.Ed.2d 78 (1979); United States v. Lewis, 475 F.2d 571, 574 (5 Cir. 1973); Timmreck v. United States, 577 F.2d 372 , 376 n.15 (6 Cir. 1978), rev’d on other grounds, 441 U.S. 780 , 99 S.Ct. 2085 , 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); cf. Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Rule 16 (“A proposed opinion approved…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Keezer
(2×)
United States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371 , 25 S.Ct. 662 , 49 L.Ed. 1089 (1905); see also United States v. Washington, 520 F.2d 676, 684 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Cutler, 37 F.Supp. 724 (D.Idaho 1941).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anne Moen Bullitt Biddle Brewster v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e. g., United States v. Caldwell, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 20 , 26 & n. 19, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1339 & n. 19 (1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976); United States v. Bryant, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 72 , 78, 471 F.2d 1040, 1046 (1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1112 , 93 S.Ct. 923 , 34 L.Ed.2d 693 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State of Mich.
See also the United States Court of Appeals' decision in United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (1974), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976), wherein the court stated: "In treating treaty Indian fishermen no differently from other citizens of the state, the state has rendered the treaty guarantees nugatory." In holding that the State of Washington could not exact a fishing license fee from Indians fishing outside their reservation because of the special off-reservation fishing rights secured to them by treaty, the Supreme …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michigan
See also the United States Court of Appeals’ decision in United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (1974), aff’d, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976), wherein the court stated: “In treating treaty Indian fishermen no differently from other citizens of the state, the state has rendered the treaty guarantees nugatory.” In holding that the State of Washington could not exact a fishing license fee from Indians fishing outside their reservation because of the special off-reservation fishing rights secured to them by treaty, the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David E. Henderson v. Louis Milobsky
See also Id. at 309-311 n.1-2 (breakdown of jurisdictions accepting the rejecting Canterbury ) 14 We might remind at the outset that one panel of this court does not override the decision of another, United States v. Caldwell, 178 U.S.App.D.C. 20 , 56 n. 19, 543 F.2d 1333 , 1369 n.19 (1974) (supplemental opinion), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976), and cases there cited 15 On the risk-disclosure point, the Haven opinion states merely that the panel "re(lied) Primarily on the findings and reasoning set out in" the District Court's opinion.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Erhard
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-576.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (9) · Fourth Circuit (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.