green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 ·
…when testified at trial that he had forgotten much of what he had seen that night, the tape was admissible as a prior inconsistent statement.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Bell v. City of Milwaukee
But see United States v, Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 (8th Cir.1976), certiorari denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 .
cited
Cited "but see"
Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee, Howard Johnson and Edwin Shaffer, Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. Thomas Grady, Jr., Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee
But see United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 (8th Cir.1976), certiorari denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Vaska v. State
(2×)
when testified at trial that he had forgotten much of what he had seen that night, the tape was admissible as a prior inconsistent statement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dishman v. State
the general rule is that where there is no evidence supporting conviction of a lesser degree of homicide, no instructions on lesser offenses should be given.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Leighton Lee Fay
t has never been the rule that a party may call a witness where his testimony is known to be adverse for the purpose of impeaching him.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sayles
See id. - 28 - 365 A.2d 545, 552-53 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 (1977), this Court held that the trial court properly sustained an objection to defense counsel’s opening statement because counsel’s statement encouraged the jury to disregard the law, thereby essentially encouraging the jury to engage in jury nullification.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spain v. State
(2×)
See Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 481 , 365 A.2d 545, 553-54 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
The Court of Appeals has said that, “under certain circumstances, a prosecutor’s argument during rebuttal and in response to comments made by the defense during its closing are proper.” Degren, 352 Md. at 431 , 722 A.2d 887 ; see Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 481 , 365 A.2d 545 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Degren v. State
See Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 481 , 365 A.2d 545, 553-54 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis B. Moore, Sr., United States of America v. Keven L. Wyrick
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 496 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Moore
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 496 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Higginbotham v. State
See Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 477 , 365 A.2d 545 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ernest John Young v. Gary Deland
See Johnson v. United States, 539 F.2d 1241, 1243 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 (1977). 34 Bailey v. Cowley, No. 89-5100, Slip Op. (10th Cir. Sept. 25, 1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Phillip Wayne Bailey v. Jack Cowley Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
See Johnson v. United States, 539 F.2d 1241, 1243 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 228 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brings Plenty
(2×)
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 495-97 (8th Cir.1976) cert. denied 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grey Bear
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 497 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Loren Grey Bear, Tayron Dale Dunn, A/K/A Terry Dunn, Leonard George Fox and John Emmanuel Perez, A/K/A John Perez, United States of America v. Jesse Dean Cavanaugh, Paul Henry Cavanaugh, Maynard James Dunn, Timothy Sylvester Longie, Jr., Roger Darrel Charboneau, Dwayne Allen Charboneau, Richard John Lafuente, A/K/A Ricky Lafuente
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 497 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bloodsworth v. State
See generally Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 482 , 365 A.2d 545 (1976), US. cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977) (even if prosecutor’s remarks were improper, the possibility of prejudice was cured by the courts instruction); Brooks v. State, 68 Md.
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Coleman Company, Inc.
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 497 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Coleman Co.
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 497 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse James Jackson v. Charles C. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 502 (8th Cir.1976) (“the overall evidence of appellant’s guilt was overwhelming and his conviction cannot reasonably be said to have been influenced by the speculative use by the jury of the impeachment statement as substantive evidence”), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sheri Lee McCrady
First, the witness’ out-of-court statement must be inconsistent with the witness’ in-court testimony. “[I]nconsistency is not limited to diametrically opposed answers but may be found in evasive answers, inability to recall, silence, or changes of position.” United States v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 782, 795 (8th Cir.1980); see United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 495-96 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lugene Baker
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); United States v. Payne, 492 F.2d 449 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 876 , 95 S.Ct. 139 , 42 L.Ed.2d 116 (1974); United States v. Insana, 423 F.2d 1165 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 83 , 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grady Lee Smith v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See Clayton v. Estelle, 541 F.2d 486, 488 (5th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977) (this court rejected habeas petitioner’s contention that district court was required to conduct an evidentiary hearing into voluntariness of his state court guilty pleas because transcript of plea hearing was clearly sufficient on its face to demonstrate that decision to plead guilty was voluntary, even though transcript contained some ambiguity).
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Hatten v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 500 (8th Cir.1976), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977). 7 The relevant factual inquiry in such an analysis is whether, under the circumstances, the jury will be afforded a satisfactory basis for evaluating the truth of the out-of-court statement.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander Bishop
(2×)
A “witness, favorable to the defendant, should be more than willing to give the usual suggested explanations for the inaccuracy of his prior statement, such as faulty perception or undue haste in recounting the event.” California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 160 , 90 S.Ct. 1930 , 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970); see United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 , 501 n. 12 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Mason Alexander
See United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684, 685 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); United States v. Gray, 626 F.2d 494, 501 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1091 , 101 S.Ct. 887 , 66 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevenson v. State
(2×)
See Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 477-478 , 365 A.2d 545 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S. Ct. 2183 , 53 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Stahl
See United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 496 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); United States v. Dye, 508 F.2d 1226, 1234 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. *34 974, 95 S.Ct. 1395 , 43 L.Ed.2d 653 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald G. Lyman
See United States v. Perry, 550 F.2d 524, 529 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 228 , 434 U.S. 827 , 98 S.Ct. 104 , 54 L.Ed.2d 85 (1977); United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 160 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Carr, Jr.
See United States v. Perry, 550 F.2d 524 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 228 (1977); United States v. Grant, 494 F.2d 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 849 , 95 S.Ct. 87 , 42 L.Ed.2d 79 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
See Dishman, 352 Md. at 289-90 , 721 A.2d 699 (reaffirming that a short form indictment “alleging first degree murder also charges second degree murder and manslaughter”) (emphasis omitted); see also Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 476 , 365 A.2d 545 (1976) (“In first degree murder indictments filed pursuant to this provision, it is well settled that murder in the second degree and manslaughter are lesser included offenses”), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); State v. Evans, 278 Md. 197 , 199 n. 1, 362 A.2d 629 (1976) (“Under such an indictment the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Lee Baldwin
See, e.g., United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684, 685 (9th Cir.1976) (doctrine applicable where error “was induced” by defendant’s counsel), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); Guthrie, 931 F.2d at 567 (error invited where defendant declined court’s offer to instruct jury on elements of constructive possession).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brigette Karin Johnson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See also Burgess v. Premier Corp., 727 F.2d 826, 834 (9th Cir.1984) (attorney may waive client's right to raise issue of error by eliciting inadmissible evidence). 17 We recently reiterated that "[t]he doctrine of invited error prevents a defendant from complaining of an error that was his own fault." United States v. Reyes-Alvarado, 963 F.2d 1184 , (9th Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684, 685 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-Ramirez
See, e.g., United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684, 685 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Murillo
See, e.g., United States v. Francoeur, 547 F.2d 891 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 228 , 431 U.S. 923 , 97 S.Ct. 2197 , 53 L.Ed.2d 238 , 431 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 2640 , 53 L.Ed.2d 249 (1977); State v. Buswell, 460 N.W.2d 614 (Minn.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1107 , 113 L.Ed.2d 216 (1991); State v. McDaniel, 44 Ohio App.2d 163 , 337 N.E.2d 173 (1975); Paul G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Crowell
See, e.g., United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684, 685 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 431 U.S. 918 , United States v. Lyon, 588 F.2d 581 (8th Cir. 1979); United States v. Ferretti, 508 F. Supp. 913 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dewey E. Coleman v. Henry Risley, Warden, Montana State Prison, and Michael T. Greely, Attorney General for the State of Montana
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684, 685 (9th Cir.1976) (involving motion for recusal), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); Commonwealth v. Wilson, 381 Mass. 90 , 407 N.E.2d 1229 , 1248-49 (1980) (due process challenge in death penalty case); accord United States v. Bunch, 730 F.2d 517, 519 (7th Cir.1984) (recusal motion).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Netz, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 494 (8th Cir.1976) (improper closing argument held harmless error), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
See, e.g., Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 477 , 365 A.2d 545 , cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1976); Dillon v. State, 277 Md. 571, 584-585 , 357 A.2d 360 (1976); England & Edwards v. State, 274 Md. 264, 275-276 , 334 A.2d 98 (1975); Hardison v. State, 226 Md. 53, 60-61 , 172 A.2d 407 (1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert L. Russell
See also United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 495-96 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard Kuhn
United States v. Stahl, 616 F.2d 30, 33 (2d Cir.1980); see also United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490, 496-97 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Little Store, Inc. v. State
See, e.g., Blackwell v. State, 278 Md. 466, 477 , 365 A.2d 545, 551-52 (1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2183 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977); Duffin v. State, 229 Md. 434, 436 , 184 A.2d 624, 625 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George Tolbert v. Arnold R. Jago, Supt.
(2×)
See also U. S. v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 (8th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977). 18 Here there are strong indicators of reliability, and the jury had an ample basis upon which to determine the trustworthiness of the testimony. 19 Id. at 1144. 20 This conviction does not depend solely upon the cross-examination of Jordan, the eyewitness with the incredibly fallible memory.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Verne Allen Lyon
Compare United States v. Montecalvo, 545 F.2d 684 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2184 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977), where it was held that per se reversible error rule did not apply where trial judge read presentence report after defendant had entered guilty plea which later aborted during the Rule 11 hearing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Earl A. Garner, United States of America v. Everett C. McKethan
(2×)
See also U. S. v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977). 12 Here there are strong indicators of reliability, and the jury had an ample basis upon which to determine the trustworthiness of the testimony. 13 One of the two young women who, according to Robinson's grand jury testimony, had accompanied Garner and him on their trip to Amsterdam beginning on October 15, 1974, was produced as a witness at the trial.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Montecalvo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-6150.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1977.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.