C. v. F., 429 U.S. 907 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
C. v. F., 429 U.S. 907 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Garza v. Maverick Market, Inc. (tex, 1989-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Garza v. Maverick Market, Inc. (2×)
Tex. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re K, 520 S.W.2d 424, 426-27 (Tex.Civ.App — Cor pus Christi 1975) (requiring strict compliance with statutory provisions for voluntary legitimation under sections 13.21 and 13.22), aff'd, 535 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 189 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" In the Interest of T. E. T. (2×)
Tex. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See In the Interest of K, 535 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 1010 , 97 S.Ct. 542 , 50 L.Ed.2d 620 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" In Interest of C----D----V
Tex. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
Travis County Child Welfare Unit v. Vance, 566 S.W.2d 112, 115 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1978, no writ); See In Interest of K, 535 S.W.2d 168, 170 (Tex.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." J.A.R. v. Superior Court
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re D., 24 Or.App. 601 , 547 P.2d 175 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James Durward Harper, James Durward Harper v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, United States of America, Real Party in Interest
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Martinez, 536 F.2d 886 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976) (right to 20 peremptory challenges under Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(b) does not apply if death penalty provision is unconstitutional), with United States v. Watson, 496 F.2d 1125 (4th Cir.1973) (right to two lawyers applies regardless of constitutionality of death penalty provision) 4 Among the safeguards the district court believed petitioner was entitled to was the right to a second attorney.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Harper
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Martinez, 536 F.2d 886 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 273 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976) (right to 20 peremptory challenges under Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(b) does not apply if death penalty provision is unconstitutional), with United States v. Watson, 496 F.2d 1125 (4th Cir.1973) (right to two lawyers applies regardless of constitutionality of death penalty provision). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
C.
v.
F.
No. 76-5175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1976.
429 U.S. 907
Certiorari.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Ct. App. Ore. Motion of Child Advocacy Project et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.