green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Franks v. Nimmo
See Hines, 696 F.2d at 728 . 1 “[WJhile subsection (b)(1) requires recusal if the judge has actual personal bias or prejudice or extrajudicial knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts, subsection (a) requires recusal merely if the circumstances are such that the judge’s ‘impartiality might be reasonably questioned’____ Under section 455(a), the judge is under a continuing duty to ask himself what a reasonable person knowing all the relevant facts would think about his impartiality.” Id. (quoting United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459, 462 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Joan E. Verniero v. Air Force Academy School District 20
(2×)
Texaco, Inc. v. Chandler, 354 F.2d 655, 657 (10th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 936 , 86 S.Ct. 1066 , 15 L.Ed.2d 853 (1966); see United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976); Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Chandler, 303 F.2d 55 (10th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 915 , 83 S.Ct. 718 , 9 L.Ed.2d 722 (1963); United States v. Ritter, 273 F.2d 30 (10th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 950 , 80 S.Ct. 863 , 4 L.Ed.2d 869 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Knight
(2×)
See People v. Johnson, 396 Mich. 424 , 240 N.W.2d 729 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976) (silence by defense counsel did not amount to consent by defendant); State v. Sedillo, 88 N.M. 240 , 539 P.2d 630 (N.M.App.1975) (counsel assumed objection would be useless under the circumstances); 1 Wharton’s Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Idaho v. Freeman
See, United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976); Rice v. McKenzie, 581 F.2d 1114 (4th Cir. 1978); United States v. Cowden, 545 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 1181 , 51 L.Ed.2d 585 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paschall v. Mayone
That section requires a judge of the United States to disqualify himself “in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” It was designed to negate the “duty to sit” notion applicable under 28 U.S.C. § 144 , United States v. Wolfson, supra, 558 F.2d at 63 ; see Rosen v. Sugarman, supra, 357 F.2d at 797-98, and to allow “a greater flexibility in determining whether disqualification is warranted in particular situations.” United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459, 462 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976); accord, Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perpich v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.
See also, United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459, 464 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976) (district court should look at the “total facts” in deciding motion for disqualification).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca5 1981
See also United States v. Ritter, 10 Cir. 1976, 540 F.2d 463 (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976) 8 The defendants tentatively identified eleven unsuccessful black applicants, based on the recollection of PEER executives or on the fact that some applicants graduated from predominantly black universities or colleges.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance & Expenditure Review
See also United States v. Ritter, 10 Cir. 1976, 540 F.2d 463 (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fong v. American Airlines, Inc.
See, e. g., United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459 (C.A. 10, 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1977).
Michigan
v.
Johnson
v.
Johnson
No. 76-372.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1976.
Cited by 37 opinions | Published
Sup, Ct. Mich. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied, it appearing that judgment below rests on adequate state grounds.