green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2002 · 2 courts ·
…the fact that may have discontinued the offending practice before the commission issued the complaint ... does not bar a cease-and-desist order, where the public interest otherwise requires it.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Trade Commission v. 1263523 Ontario, Inc.
the fact that may have discontinued the offending practice before the commission issued the complaint ... does not bar a cease-and-desist order, where the public interest otherwise requires it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Trade Commission v. 1263523 Ontario, Inc.
the fact that may have discontinued the offending practice before the commission issued the complaint ... does not bar a cease-and-desist order, where the public interest otherwise requires it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Trade Commission v. American Standard Credit Systems, Inc.
the fact that may have discontinued the offending practice before the commission issued the complaint ... does not bar a cease-and-desist order, where the public interest otherwise requires it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
thompson ii
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cynthia M. Stoner
(2×)
See United States v. Meyers, 646 F.2d 1142, 1145 (6th Cir.1981) (applying this rule to allow the government to rely upon facts relevant to the substantive count upon which the defendant was acquitted "in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence as to the conspiracy count" (quoting United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633 , 636 n. 1 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976))). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Tracy and Francisco Luis Aguilar
See United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633, 636 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976); Fed.R.Evid. 801.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Byrski, Michael Farmer, Anthony Fucalaro, Eugene Hornowski, Kevin McNab James J. Villalpando, and Mathew Wilson
See United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 85 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976) Qury given Silvern instruction twice). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Biaggi and Meade Esposito
We have held that “[w]here travel is motivated by two or more purposes, some of which lie outside the ambit of the Travel Act, a conviction is still possible if the requisite illegal purpose is also present.” United States v. Walsh, 700 F.2d 846, 854 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 825 , 104 S.Ct. 96 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983); see United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 75 (7th Cir.1975) (“section 1952 does not require that defendant’s travel be solely in pursuit of criminal activity”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sears, Roebuck and Co., a Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See Fedders Corp. v. FTC, 529 F.2d 1398, 1403 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976) (collecting cases). .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Bearden
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Bearden, Clarence Stowers, Jr., and Farrell Nixdorf, Defendants- United States of America v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Georgia, Inc. Georgia Waste Systems, Inc. Sca Services of Georgia, Inc. Complete Refuse Removal, Inc. James L. Baker Raymond E. Dinkle Charles W. Langello and Roy P. Fowler, Jr., Defendants- United States of America v. Northside Realty Associates, Inc. Barton & Ludwig, Inc. Harry Norman & Associates, Inc. Clover Realty Co. Edwin A. Isakson Chandler B. Barton and Harry Norman, Jr.
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976). 99 With respect to the quantitative aspect, the number of errors found in the present case is insignificant in relation to the large number of prospective jurors handled by the clerk's office.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Butts
See United States v. Evans, 5 Cir., 1976, 526 F.2d 701 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bill R. Clark
See United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 75-76 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Rauhoff, 525 F.2d 1170, 1174-75 (7th Cir. 1975); cf. United States v. Cooper, 596 F.2d 327, 330 (8th Cir. 1979) (mail fraud); United States v. Frazier, 545 F.2d 71, 74 (8th Cir. 1976) ( 18 U.S.C. § 2314 ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1078 , 97 S.Ct. 823 , 50 L.Ed.2d 798 (1977). 16 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. 1 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re United States of America v. Jane Kember and Morris Budlong, Mary Sue Hubbard, Henning Heldt, Richard Weigand, and Gregory Willardson
See United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Catlett, 584 F.2d 864 (8th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Lee v. Federal Trade Commission
See Fedders Corp. v. FTC, 529 F.2d 1398, 1403 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); Giant Food Inc. v. FTC, 322 F.2d 977, 986 (D.C.Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 967 , 84 S.Ct. 1121 , 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
McGinnis v. M. I. Harris, Inc.
See United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701, 706 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerrold E. Stevens
See United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jay Norris, Inc., Joel Jacobs, and Mortimer Williams v. Federal Trade Commission
See note 2, supra. In supporting the breadth of the order entered, the administrative law judge and Commission each relied on cases upholding somewhat similar orders requiring objective substantiation for scientific claims *1247 but involving discrete products, e. g., Fedders Corp. v. FTC, 529 F.2d 1398 (2d Cir.) (air conditioners), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. FTC, 481 F.2d 246 (6th Cir.) (tires), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1112 , 94 S.Ct. 841 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973); the Commission also relied on its case which held that represen…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert McPartlin
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 84 (7th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Sigal, 572 F.2d 1320, 1323 (9th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Craig, Frank P. North, Jr., Peter v. Pappas and Jack E. Walker
(2×)
See United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 76-77 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Coast of Maine Lobster Co., Inc.
See, United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 84-85 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); and Glazerman v. United States, 421 F.2d 547, 554 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 928 , 90 S.Ct. 1817 , 26 L.Ed.2d 90 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francisco Fernando Reyes, Fernando F. Reyes, Berta Lucia Osario De Reyes and Rafael Reyes, Jeffrey Stein
See, e.g., United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976); United States v. Valencia, 957 F.2d 1189, 1198 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 254 , 121 L.Ed.2d 185 (1992); United States v. Love, 767 F.2d 1052, 1063 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1081 , 106 S.Ct. 848 , 88 L.Ed.2d 890 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. Beacon Well Services, Inc.
See also United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701, 704 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976), rehearing denied 429 U.S. 987 , 97 S.Ct. 509 , 50 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976) (persons excused from federal jury panel for reasons asserted in a phone call or personal visit to the clerk’s office).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donnie Mack Wilson
United States v. Rushcamp, 526 F.2d 1380, 1382 (6th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701, 707 (5th Cir.) (holding dynamite bomb to be "destructive device" even though government agents twice failed to detonate it), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 (1976); United States v. Ragusa, 664 F.2d 696, 700 (8th Cir.1981) ("it is not necessary that the device function as intended"), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1133 (1982). 11 Wilson correctly points out that a device is not destructive if it is missing essential components.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hursey Davis v. Warden, Joliet Correctional Institution at Stateville Michael Lane, Director, Department of Corrections, State of Illinois
(2×)
See also United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701, 706 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976) (Chief Judge’s clerks did not violate Jury Selection and Service Act by failing to exempt qualified jurors).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley v. McLaughlin
See also Acupuncture Center of Washington v. Dunlop, 543 F.2d 852, 860 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976) (finding too restrictive an employer preference that translator speak three dialects of Chinese and have familiarity with medical terms).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus Osorno
See, e.g., United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976); United States v. Manfredonia, 414 F.2d 760, 765 (2d Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bristol-Myers Company v. Federal Trade Commission
E.g., Jay Norris, Inc. v. FTC, 598 F.2d 1244, 1245-46, 1250-51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 980 , 100 S.Ct. 481 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979); see also our decision enforcing the FTC’s order in In re Fedders Cory., 85 F.T.C. 38 , 69 (1975) (performance claims for airconditioners must be substantiated by “competent scientific, engineering or other similar objective material”), order enforced, Fedders Cory. v. FTC, 529 F.2d 1398 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Allen Tuttle and Dean Frederick Vereen
Id. § 1867; see also United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701, 705 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yvette Carson, Lemuel Mont, A/K/A \Lam
Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121,139-140 , 75 S.Ct. 127,137 , 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954); United States v. Taylor, 464 F.2d 240, 244 (2d Cir.1972); see also, United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633, 636 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward F. Ross
See also United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 84-85 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); Carlton v. United States, 359 F.2d 10, 11 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1030 , 89 S.Ct. 642 , 21 L.Ed.2d 574 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alphonse Bifulco v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrice Mespoulede, A/K/A \Patrice Fabre\""
See, e. g., United States v. Lubrano, 529 F.2d 633 , 636 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 61 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 (1976). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel S. Smith and Grover Lamar Lee, A/K/A Poss
See, e. g., United States v. Evans, 5 Cir., 1976, 526 F.2d 701, 705-06 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 62 , 50 L.Ed.2d 78 , in which we stated that: Congress, recognizing that there would undoubtedly be error in the jury selection process that should not result in the dismissal of an indictment, left room for harmless error by providing that dismissal should lie only when there was a substantial failure to comply with the Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Ralston Catlett
See also United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 86 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976); United States v. Scott, 521 F.2d 1188, 1195 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 955 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976); United States v. Gardiner, 531 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scm Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
See, e. g., Fedders Corp. v. FTC, 529 F.2d 1398, 1401-02 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hondo Drilling Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 75-1506.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
429 U.S. 818
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.