green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
15.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1979 ·
…under no circumstances, however, may a federal court prescribe immunity on its own initiative. .
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…viewing the immunity grant in its proper perspective as a powerful executive implement, it must be recognized that prosecutorial agreement may effectively function, extra-statute, to confer immunity other than through a legislatively-authorized method.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Community Television of Utah, Inc. v. Roy City
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
broadcaster
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Surina v. Buckalew
(2×)
viewing the immunity grant in its proper perspective as a powerful executive implement, it must be recognized that prosecutorial agreement may effectively function, extra-statute, to confer immunity other than through a legislatively-authorized method.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Federal Communications Commission
e think it odd that the department has not presented factual data to the commission which would allow it to assess the likely effect of its rules on various fields of competition. the department's arguments are basically speculative .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Federal Communications Commission, Satellite Business Systems, Intervenor. American Satellite Corporation and Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Satellite Business Systems, Intervenor. The Western Union Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Satellite Business Systems, Intervenor. American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Satellite Business Systems, Intervenor
(w)e think it odd that the department (of justice) has not presented factual data to the commission which would allow it to assess the likely effect of its rules on various fields of competition. the department's arguments are basically speculative .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gerald N. Klauber
(2×)
under no circumstances, however, may a federal court prescribe immunity on its own initiative. .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Austin v. United States
Ct. 112, 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977) (quoting Knotts v. United States, 128 Ct. CI. 489, 492, 121 F.Supp. 630, 631 (1954)). “ ‘Almost irre-fragable proof amounts to ‘clear and convincing evidence’ ” of bad faith on the part of the government.
discussed
Cited "see"
At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 57 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977) (decisionmakers should refuse to engage in ex parte communication with interested parties).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schwab
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillman v. Cook
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971). 102 F.3d at 1082-83 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Willis
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420 (10th Cir.) (upholding imperfect indictment because not substantially prejudicial to defendant), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Mason, 440 F.2d 1293, 1296 (10th Cir.) (upholding indictment that was “not a model of clarity”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 165 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Adamkus
Navistar, 941 F.2d at 1359 ; see Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9 , 35 n. 58 (D.C.Cir.1977) (an agency is required to address only “significant comments,” comments which “if true, raise points relevant to [its] decision”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Norwood, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New England Power Company, Intervenor
See Louisiana Ass’n of Independent Producers & Royalty Owners v. FERC, 958 F.2d 1101, 1113 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“Agency officials may meet with members of the industry ... to maintain the agency’s knowledge of the industry it regulates.... ‘[Sjueh informal contacts between agencies and the public are the “bread and butter” of the process of administration and are completely appropriate so long as they do not frustrate judicial review or raise serious questions of fairness.’”) (quoting Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 47 (D.C.Cir.), cert denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 ,…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Broiler Council v. Voss
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 57 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that "informal contacts between agencies and the public are the 'bread and butter’ of the process of administration”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Broiler Council American Meat Institute Arkansas Poultry Federation, Inc. v. Henry J. Voss, Director, California Department of Food and Agriculture, National Broiler Council American Meat Institute Arkansas Poultry Federation, Inc. v. Henry J. Voss, Director, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and the California Poultry Industry Federation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 57 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that "informal contacts between agencies and the public are the 'bread and butter' of the process of administration"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. California
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 57 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that "informal contacts between agencies and the public are the 'bread and butter’ of the process of administration"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Willis
(2×)
See In re Daley, 549 F.2d 469, 478 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, Daley v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Comm’n of Supreme Court of Illinois, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 110 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Texaco, Inc.
See United States v. Dyba, 554 F.2d 417, 420-21 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); United States v. Hernandez-Garcia, 901 F.2d 875, 876-77 (10th Cir.1990) (no plain error to tell jury that case would have to be decided by another jury, rather than leaving open possibility of settlement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erwin v. United States
See Kalvar Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192, 204 , 543 F.2d 1298 (F.E.1976) (under constructive termination for convenience doctrine, damages limited to provisions of termination for convenience clause), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ripplinger v. Collins
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 43 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Cruz, 571 F.Supp. at 132 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ripplinger v. Collins
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 43 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Cruz, 571 F.Supp. at 132 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas E. Egan v. Department of the Navy
(2×)
See Kalvar Corp., Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 192 , 543 F.2d 1298, 1301-02 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). 107 The conjecture that Navy officials might act arbitrarily is not only unwarranted, it is far too weak a reed on which to rest a determination that MSPB must decide which employees of the armed forces should be granted security clearances.
cited
Cited "see"
Olive S. McEachern v. Office of Personnel Management
See Kalvar Corp., Inc. v. United States, 543 F.2d 1298, 1301-1302 (Ct.Cl.1976), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 112 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City Of Los Angeles
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 46 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 46 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter O. Boswell Memorial Hospital v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services Howard University Hospital v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services Greater Southeast Community Hospital v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
We do expect that, if the judicial review which Congress has thought it important to provide is to be meaningful, the "concise general statement of * * * basis and purpose" mandated by [the APA] will enable us to see what major issues of policy were ventilated by the informal proceedings and why the agency reacted to them as it did. 16 Automotive Parts & Accessories Association v. Boyd, 407 F.2d 330, 338 (D.C.Cir.1968); see Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35-36 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). 17 On its review of the full admi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter O. Boswell Memorial Hospital v. Heckler
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Automotive Parts & Accessories Association v. Boyd, 407 F.2d 330, 338 (D.C.Cir.1968); see Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35-36 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen Thompson v. William P. Clark, Secretary of the Interior
See Home Box Office v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35-36 (D.C.Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
St. James Hospital v. Heckler
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35-36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977), reh. denied, 434 U.S. 988 , 98 S.Ct. 621 , 54 L.Ed.2d 484 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
State of South Carolina v. Block
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
South Carolina ex rel. Tindal v. Block
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Exxon Corporation, Texas City Refining, Inc., Environmental Defense Fund, Texaco, Inc., Intervenors. Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Exxon Corporation, Sun Refining and Marketing Company, Texas City Refining, Inc., Environmental Defense Fund, Texaco, Inc., Intervenors. Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Defense Fund, United Refining Company, Texaco, Inc., Exxon Corporation, Texas City Refining, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenors. Plateau, Inc. v. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency, Simmons Oil Company v. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 36 (D.C.Cir.) (agency must "make its views known to the public in a concrete and focused form so as to make criticism or formulation of alternatives possible"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Athens Community Hospital v. Heckler
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 567 F.2d 9, 35 (D.C.Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 36 (D.C.Cir.) (agency must “make its views known to the public in a concrete and focused form so as to make criticism or formulation of alternatives possible”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Itt World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Communications Company, Rca Global Communications, Inc., Intervenors. Itt World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Itt World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See generally Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 34-36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Portland Cement Ass'n v. Ruckelshaus, 486 F.2d 375, 392-94 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 921 , 94 S.Ct. 2628 , 41 L.Ed.2d 226 (1974) 184 WWHT, Inc. v. FCC, 656 F.2d 807 , 818 (D.C.Cir.1981) 185 See, e.g., id. at 819-20 (denial of rulemaking petition re regulation of local subscription television stations); Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. SEC, supra note 67, 606 F.2d at 1046, 1049, 1053 (same re corporate disclosure of environmental and …
cited
Cited "see"
National Cable Television Ass'n v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal
See generally Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Cable Television Association v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, American Society of Composers, Intervenors. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, National Cable Television Association
See generally Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977) 13 A cable system retransmits signals from a distant community when the system is located outside of the local service area of the FCC-licensed television station in that community.
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent v. Lewis
See 5 U.S.C. § 554 (1976) 64 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) 65 Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415 , 91 S.Ct. 814, 823 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) 66 Id. at 416 , 91 S.Ct. at 823 67 Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 185 D.C.App. 142, 567 F.2d 9, 35 (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977), quoting Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 , 83 S.Ct. 239, 245 , 9 L.Ed.2d 207 (1962) 68 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(D); Overton Park, 401 U.S. at 417 , 91 S.Ct. at 824 69 K.
discussed
Cited "see"
Effie Roy Stansbury, Personal Representative of the Estate of Larry R. Stansbury v. Sikorski Aircraft, Chevron USA
(2×)
See Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp., 545 F.2d 422 , 432 n.11 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 110 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Department of Transportation
The court must also assure itself that rescission is “based on consideration of the relevant factors,” FCC v. National Citizens Comm. for Broadcasting, 436 U.S. 775, 802-03 , 98 S.Ct. 2096, 2115-2116 , 56 L.Ed.2d 697 (1978); see Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977), and determine that NHTSA made “a considered evaluation of the presently available alternatives.” Pillai v. CAB, 485 F.2d 1018, 1029 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Kent Mason, Patricia Warren and Leorlin Boyd v. Department of Transportation, Drew Lewis, as Secretary, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Raymond A. Peck, Jr., as Administrator, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, Consumer Alert and Pacific Legal Foundation, Intervenors. National Association of Independent Insurers, Automobile Owners Action Council, and Eugene J. Meyung v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Consumer Alert and Pacific Legal Foundation, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Intervenors
The court must also assure itself that rescission is "based on consideration of the relevant factors," FCC v. National Citizens Comm. for Broadcasting, 436 U.S. 775, 802-03 , 98 S.Ct. 2096, 2115-2116 , 56 L.Ed.2d 697 (1978); see Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977), and determine that NHTSA made "a considered evaluation of the presently available alternatives." Pillai v. CAB, 485 F.2d 1018, 1029 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. Jones
(2×)
See for example, In re Daley, 549 F.2d 469 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 110 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Mullins and United Mine Workers of America v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Consolidation Coal Co., Intervenor
See Action for Children’s Television, Inc. v. FCC, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 437, 453 , 564 F.2d 458, 474 (1977), and Hercules, Inc. v. EPA, 194 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 207-208 , 598 F.2d 91 , 126-127 (1978) refusing automatic application of legal rules newly laid down in Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 185 U.S.App.D.C. 142, 190 , 567 F.2d 9, 57 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977), to cases pending when Home Box Office was decided. .
cited
Cited "see"
Morton H. Halperin v. Central Intelligence Agency
See Petitioner’s Brief for Certiorari at 6, Richardson v. Spahr, 434 U.S. 830 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977). 57 .
cited
Cited "see"
Midland Telecasting Company v. Midessa Television Company, Inc.
See Home Box Office v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9 (D.C.Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Diplomat Lakewood Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary, U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 185 U.S.App.D.C. 142, 167-169 , 567 F.2d 9, 34-36 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Nat’l Ass’n of Food Chains, Inc. v. ICC, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 346, 356 , *1019 535 F.2d 1308, 1318 (1976). 20 Our “sole concern” in the Food Chains case, as it is here, was whether the agency gave “reasoned consideration to the problem and . presented a rational basis for its decision.” 175 U.S.App.D.C. at 354 , 535 F.2d at 1316 .
discussed
Cited "see"
WNCN Listeners Guild v. Federal Communications Commission
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 185 U.S.App.D.C. 142, 165 , 567 F.2d 9, 32 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977) (Policy Statement constitutes “request to this court to reconsider its position in WEFM.") .
discussed
Cited "see"
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Behnke
(2×)
See In re Daley, 549 F.2d 469 , 474-77 & n.6 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 110 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); In re Abrams, 521 F.2d 1094, 1099-100 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1038 , 96 S.Ct. 574 , 46 L.Ed.2d 413 (1975); Polk v. State Bar, 480 F.2d 998, 1001-02 (5th Cir. 1973); Echeles, 430 F.2d at 349-50 ; Mildner v. Gulotta, 405 F.Supp. at 191 ; In re Bogart, 386 F.Supp. 126, 131 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Braniff Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, , American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., United States of America, Delta Air Lines, Inc., City of Kansas City, Missouri and Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City, Intervenors. Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc. And Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc. And City of Kansas City, Missouri, Intervenors. Ozark Air Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Air Lines, Inc. And American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors
Departments and agencies outside of the Executive Office of the President which regularly make recommendations to the President in connection with the Presidential review pursuant to section 801 shall . . . (a) establish public dockets for all written communications (other than those requiring confidential treatment for defense or foreign policy reasons) between their officers and employees and private parties in connection with the preparation of such recommendations; and (b) prescribe such other procedures governing oral and written communications as they deem appropriate. 3 C.F.R. 121, 123 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Departments and agencies outside of the Executive Office of the President which regularly make recommendations to the President in connection with the Presidential review pursuant to section 801 shall (a) establish public dockets for all written communications (other than those requiring confidential treatment for defense or foreign policy reasons) between their officers and employees and private parties in connection with the preparation of such recommendations; and (b) prescribe such other procedures governing oral and written communications as they deem appropriate. 3 C.F.R. 121, 123 (1977)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Glover Construction Co. v. Andrus
(2×)
See In re Daley, 549 F.2d 469 , 480 n. 11 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 110 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daley
v.
Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
v.
Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
No. 76-1720.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Cited by 346 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.