green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mario Micomonaco v. State Of Washington
See DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 899 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978). 29 In contrast, the final sentence of section 47.60.210 assigns the proper venue for suits brought under the provision in state courts ("The venue of such actions may be in the superior court for Thurston County or the county where the injury occurred").
cited
Cited "see"
Micomonaco v. Washington
See DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 899 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rudisill v. Sheraton Copenhagen Corp.
If the competing courts are U.S. federal trial courts, Title 28 of the United States Code, section 1404(a) mitigates the harshness of the doctrine of forum non conveniens by allowing the district court to transfer the case “[f]or the convenience of [the] parties and witnesses, [and] in the interest of justice” to another federal trial court, instead of dismissing the action outright. 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a); see DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 899 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L,Ed.2d 494 (1978) (explaining that § 1404(a) “mitigates the possible ha…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. California Horse Racing Board, and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1501
See NLRB v. Committee of Interns & Residents, 566 F.2d 810 (2d Cir.1977) (state regulation preempted where Board had asserted jurisdiction but had determined that workers at issue were not entitled to collective bargaining rights under NLRA), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); NLRB v. State of New York, 436 F.Supp. 335 (E.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 591 F.2d 1331 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harilaos Kukias v. Chandris Lines, Inc.
As correctly noted by defendants, in Rhoditis the Supreme Court stated that “the shipowner’s base of operations is another factor of importance in determining whether the Jones Act is applicable; and there well may be others.” Rhoditis, 398 U.S. at 309 , 90 S.Ct. at 1734 (emphasis in original); see DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 901 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sports Eye, Inc. v. Daily Racing Form, Inc.
See DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 900 (3d Cir.1977) (quoting Gulf Oil Co. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 509 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 843 , 91 L.Ed. 1055 (1947)), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978). *640 In this case, the need for a California court to hear the state law tort claims is particularly acute.
discussed
Cited "see"
Maria Arlete Vaz Borralho v. Keydril Company, Key International Drilling Company, Ltd. And Key Perfuracoes Maritimas, Ltda.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895 , 902 n. 3 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Michael Kelly
See United States v. Powell, 564 F.2d 256, 259 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); United States v. Blake, 484 F.2d 50, 58 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 3076 , 41 L.Ed.2d 669 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company
Co., 218 F.2d 353, 357 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 922 , 75 S.Ct. 661 , 99 L.Ed. 1254 (1955); see Founding Church of Scientology v. Verlag, 536 F.2d 429, 436 (D.C.Cir.1976) (difficulty in applying German law not sufficient) 50 420 F.2d at 427 51 DeMateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 899 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allan v. Brown & Root, Inc.
See, De Mateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 899-900 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978); Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc., 263 F.2d 437, 443 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1000 , 79 S.Ct. 1138 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fosen v. United Technologies Corp.
Fitzgerald v. Texaco, Inc., supra, 521 F.2d at 454 ; see also De Mateos v. Texaco, Inc., 562 F.2d 895, 900 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 494 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Preston Sellers, United States of America v. Johnnie Caradine, United States of America v. Donald Allen, United States of America v. William E. Jewett, United States of America v. Dennis Lavern English, United States of America v. William James Monroe
See, e. g., United States v. Powell, 564 F.2d 256 (8th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); United States v. Losing, 560 F.2d 906 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 516 , 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); United States v. Rich, 518 F.2d 980 (8th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 427 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 3193 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1200 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sellers
See, e. g., United States v. Powell, 564 F.2d 256 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 1449 , 55 L.Ed.2d 495 (1978); United States v. Losing, 560 F.2d 906 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 516 , 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977); United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); United States v. Rich, 518 F.2d 980 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 3193 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1200 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moore
v.
Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad
v.
Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad
No. 77-786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1978.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.