green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corporation v. Anthony Page, Dba Easy Associates, Page Industries, and Easy Bed, and Easy Bed, Incorporated
See Miller Brewing Co. v. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75 (7th Cir.1977) (LITE used for light beer), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed. *678 2d 772 (1978); American Druggists’ Syndicate v. United States Industrial Alcohol Co., 2 F.2d 942 (D.C.Cir.1924) (AL-KOL used for rubbing alcohol); 1 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pizzazz Pizza & Restaurant v. Taco Bell Corp.
See Miller Brewing Co. v. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75, 79 (7th Cir.1977), cert denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978); Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc., 537 F.2d 4, 9 (2d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Wsm, Incorporated v. Dennis E. Hilton and Country Shindig Opry, Inc.
See Miller Brewing Co. v. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75, 79-80 (7th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Salton Inc. v. Cornwall Corp.
See Miller Brewing Co. v. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75, 79 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co.
Compare Miller Brewing Co. v. Heileman Brewing Co, 561 F.2d 75 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978) (term held generic partly because of widespread industry use of “light” beer); Gear, Inc. v. L.A.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spirol International Corp. v. Vogelsang Corp.
Trademarks are classified as to their ability to effectively accomplish this task, id.; see also Miller Brewing Co. v. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75, 79 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978); Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc., 537 F.2d 4, 9 (2d Cir.1976), and fall into four categories: 1) generic or common descriptive; 2) merely descriptive; 3) suggestive; and 4) arbitrary or fanciful.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See e.g., Murphy v. L & J Press Corp., 558 F.2d 407 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1025 , 98 S.Ct. 751 , 54 L.Ed.2d 772 (1977) (improper issue of who had the duty to guard was tried); Cf. Christner v. E.W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.
See also Roy v. Star Chopper Co., Inc., 442 F.Supp. 1010, 1021 (D.R.I. 1977), aff’d, 584 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir.1978), stating that “[t]he Bexiga rule is consistent with the dual rationale of products liability — that the manufacturer is better able to distribute the costs of accidents and develop an all-purpose safety device.” The question of who should guard rather than whether Gulf & Western could guard is a “false issue of fact” with “only the most tenuous, if any, relevance to the question of feasibility.” Murphy v. L & J Press Corp., 558 F.2d 407, 411-12 (8th Cir.1977), cert.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
L. & J. Press Corp.
v.
Murphy
v.
Murphy
No. 77-662.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari and/or motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.