green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“t is generally left to the discretion of the executing officers to determine the details of how best to proceed with the performance of a search authorized by a warrant-subject of course to the general fourth amendment protection 'against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
United States v. Ferrara
(3×)
also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see"
t is generally left to the discretion of the executing officers to determine the details of how best to proceed with the performance of a search authorized by a warrant-subject of course to the general fourth amendment protection 'against unreasonable searches and seizures.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bianco
See United States v. Volpe, 430 F.Supp. 931, 945 (D.Conn.1977), aff'd, 578 F.2d 1372 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 930 , 99 S.Ct. 2049 , 60 L.Ed.2d 658 (1979). 82 (2) Particularity. 83 The defendants contend that "[t]he 1986 amendment to Title III, no matter how it is read does away with the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment and is an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional power." U.S. Const. Amend.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bianco
See United States v. Volpe, 430 F.Supp. 931, 945 (D.Conn.1977), aff'd, 578 F.2d 1372 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 930 , 99 S.Ct. 2049 , 60 L.Ed.2d 658 (1979). (2) Particularity.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Corbit Houle
See -U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2049 , 60 L.Ed.2d 658 (1979). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradford
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1127.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.