green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bernstein v. State of New York
But cf. Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,— U.S. —, 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978) (habeas corpus petition; “silence in the face of a substantial constitutional question suggests a serious void in the appellate process”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caro-Quintero
See, Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 412 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, Ward v. Bulger, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Simmons
See Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); Owen v. McMann, 435 F.2d 813, 816 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 906 , 91 S.Ct. 1373 , 28 L.Ed.2d 646 (1971). 4 20 Here, it is possible in the abstract that the district court's decision not to redact the disputed testimony after the close of evidence denied appellants the opportunity to confront the evidence against them.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simmons
See Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); Owen v. McMann, 435 F.2d 813, 816 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 906 , 91 S.Ct. 1373 , 28 L.Ed.2d 646 (1971). 4 Here, it is possible in the abstract that the district courts decision not to redact the disputed testimony after the close of evidence denied appellants the opportunity to confront the evidence against them.
cited
Cited "see"
Coronado v. Lefevre
See Suggs v. La Vallee, 570 F.2d 1092 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Scully
See Suggs v. LaValle, 570 F.2d 1092 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978) (plea held invalid because Suggs had been mentally incompetent when they were entered); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman Silverstein v. Robert Henderson
For “it is contradictory to argue that a defendant may be incompetent, and yet knowingly or intelligently ‘waive’ his right to have the court determine his capacity to stand trial.” Id.; see Suggs v. LaVallee, 570 F.2d 1092, 1116-17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Edgar
See United States v. Dost, 575 F.2d 1303 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 916 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edgar
See, United States v. Dost, 575 F.2d 1303 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 916 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978), wherein the fact that the defendant might have received some bad advice from his lawyer did not shield him from the consequences of his act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, Warden
See also Bulger v. McClay, 575 F.2d 407, 411 (2d Cir.) (jury’s difficulty in reaching a verdict supported a finding of actual prejudice resulting from the jury’s discussion of extraneous evidence), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billy G. Byers
See, e.g., Suggs v. LaVallee, 570 F.2d 1092, 1119 (2d Cir.) (Kaufman, J., concurring) (‘‘[P]sychiatry is at best an inexact science, if, indeed, it is a science, lacking the coherent set of proven underlying values necessary for ultimate decisions on knowledge or competence."), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 290 , 58 L.Ed.2d 263 (1978); Diamond & Louisell, supra note 84, at 1340-43; Ennis & Litwack, Psychiatry and the Presumption of Innocence: Flipping Coins in the Courtroom, 62 Calif.L.Rev. 693, 729-32 (1974); Kubie, The Ruby Case: Who or What Was On Trial, 1 J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LaVallee, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Suggs
v.
Suggs
No. 77-1681.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1978.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.