green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“e recognize the trial judge's discretion to confine the testimony of the expert within the limits of the facts shown.”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bass v. Spitz
e recognize the trial judge's discretion to confine the testimony of the expert within the limits of the facts shown.
examined
Cited "see"
Drilex Systems, Inc. v. Flores
(4×)
See Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 630 (6 th Cir.) (“[H]ad the framers intended [an automatic exemption for experts], they would have said so, or added a fourth exception.”), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Opus 3 Limited v. Heritage Park, Incorporated, and Paul Stein, and James O'Brien David Kopp David J. Mislin John Does, Third Party
See Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 630 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Lee Kosko
See Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corporation, 570 F.2d 626, 629 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Croom
See generally Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 629 (6th Cir. 1978) (“We perceive little, if any, reason for sequestering a witness who is to testify in an expert capacity only and not to the facts of the case.”), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 ; 54 L.Ed.2d 94 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Burgess
See Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 629-30 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Porak
See Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978); Skidmore v. Northwest Engineering Co., 90 F.R.D. 75 (S.D.Fla.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
(D.I. 159, p. 8.) On the basis of this representation, the Court concludes that Mr. Lank’s presence is essential and he will be permitted to remain in the courtroom. 3 Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 615[1] at 615-8; see Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626 (C.A.6), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Garmon v. United States
See, e.g., Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 629-630 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malek v. Federal Insurance Company
Rule 615(3) provides an exception for "a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of the party's cause." The advisory committee notes specify that the exception contemplates "an expert needed to advise counsel in the management of the litigation." Fed.R.Evid. 615(3) advisory committee notes; see Trans World Metals, Inc. v. South Wire Co., 769 F.2d 902, 911 (2d Cir.1985) (expert allowed to remain in the courtroom for the testimony of the adversary's expert); see also Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 630 (6th Cir.) ("where a fair showin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malek v. Federal Insurance
Rule 615(3) provides an exception for “a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of the party’s cause.” The advisory committee notes specify that the exception contemplates “an expert needed to advise counsel in the management of the litigation.” Fed.R.Evid. 615(3) advisory committee notes; see Trans World Metals, Inc. v. South Wire Co., 769 F.2d 902, 911 (2d Cir.1985) (expert allowed to remain in the courtroom for the testimony of the adversary’s expert); see also Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 630 (6th Cir.) (“where…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Windsor Shirt Co. v. New Jersey National Bank
See, e.g., *618 Cannon, 519 F.Supp. at 678 (court lifted sequestration for expert and lay witness who was an attorney); see also Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626, 629-30 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978) (expert witness is not automatically exempt from sequestration under Rule 615(3)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodman v. West Coast Brace & Limb, Inc.
See also Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp., 570 F.2d 626 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael James Ardoin v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc. And Xyz Insurance Company
See, e.g., Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corporation, 570 F.2d 626 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 44 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKie
v.
Alaska
v.
Alaska
No. 77-6766.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 6, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)
Sup. Ct. Alaska. Cer-tiorari dismissed September 6, 1978, under this Court’s Rule 60.