Boehm v. North Carolina Bd. of Podiatry Examiners, 259 S.E.2d 298 (N.C. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Boehm v. North Carolina Bd. of Podiatry Examiners, 259 S.E.2d 298 (N.C. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matter of Stradford (ncctapp, 1995-08-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Stradford
N.C. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Mental Health Center, 42 N.C.App. 292, 296 , 256 S.E.2d 818, 821 (court has inherent power to take action necessary to "fulfill their assigned mission of administering justice efficiently and promptly"), disc. rev. denied, 298 N.C. 297 , 259 S.E.2d 298 (1979); see also In re Will of Hester, 320 N.C. 738, 741 , 360 S.E.2d 801, 804 (defining inherent power to include "broad discretionary powers sufficient to meet the circumstances of each case"), reh'g denied, 321 N.C. 300 , 362 S.E.2d 780 (1987); Hicks-Bey v. United States, 649 A.2d 569, 574-75 (D.C.App.1994) (trial court had inherent…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Connelly Ex Rel. McBride v. Family Inns of America, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
P. 28(b)(5); Smith v. Carolina Coach Co., 120 N.C.App. 106, 114-15 , 461 S.E.2d 362, 367 (1995) (holding plaintiff's mere contention in brief that evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case of defamation in the form of libel without supporting reason or argument insufficient to preserve issue for appellate review); see also Brown v. Boney, 41 N.C.App. 636, 647 , 255 S.E.2d 784, 790-91 (holding plaintiff's listing of several cases in its brief with no attempt to relate those cases to its assignment of error violated Appellate Rule 28), cert. denied, 298 N.C. 294 , 259 S.E.2d 910 (1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dr. Donald P. BOEHM
v.
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PODIATRY EXAMINERS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 25, 1979.
259 S.E.2d 298
Published

Farris, Thomas & Farris, for plaintiff.

Broughton, Wilkins, Ross & Crampton, for defendant.

Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari, 41 N.C.App. 567, 255 S.E.2d 328. Denied upon defendant's motion to deny petition for failure to comply with rules.