State Ex Rel. Comm'r of Ins. v. North Carolina Rate Bureau, 273 S.E.2d 300 (N.C. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
State Ex Rel. Comm'r of Ins. v. North Carolina Rate Bureau, 273 S.E.2d 300 (N.C. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1998 · …t is generally for the jury to decide whether plaintiff reasonably relied upon representations made by defendant. ⚠ not in text
87 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLP (ncctapp, 1998-04-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLP (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
t is generally for the jury to decide whether plaintiff reasonably relied upon representations made by defendant.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
N.C. · 1994 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an issue as to the existence of power or authority in a particular administrative agency is one primarily of statutory construction.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) STATE EX REL. COM'R OF INS. v. Rate Bureau (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
Id. at 444, 269 S.E.2d at 586 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
Id. at 444, 269 S.E.2d at 586 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty
N.C. · 1989 · confidence medium
North Carolina cases have long been consistent with this “modern tendency.” Id. at 402, 269 S.E. 2d at 563 (emphasis added) (citations omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Friends of Hatteras Island National Historic Maritime Forest Land Trust for Preservation, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Commission
N.C. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commissioner of Insurance v. Rate Bureau, 300 N.C. 381, 395 , 269 S.E.2d 547, 559 , rehearing denied, 301 N.C. 107 , 273 S.E.2d 300 (1980) (adequate procedure for judicial review exists under N.C.
cited Cited "see" Whittington v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
N.C. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Comr. of Insurance v. Rate Bureau, 300 N.C. 381 , 269 S.E.2d 547 , reh’g denied, 301 N.C. 107 , 273 S.E.2d 300 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina ex rel. COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE
v.
NORTH CAROLINA RATE BUREAU, North Carolina Reinsurance Facility, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Great American Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, United States Fire Insurance Company and The Shelby Mutual Insurance Company.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 16, 1980.
273 S.E.2d 300
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2) · Supreme Court of North Carolina (1)

Isham B. Hudson, Jr., and Vance C. Kinlaw, Hunter, Wharton & Howell, Raleigh, for plaintiff.

[*301] Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis, Raleigh, for defendants.

Maupin, Taylor & Ellis, Raleigh, for Insurance Services Office, amicus curiae.

Broughton, Wilkins, Ross & Crampton, Raleigh, for National Association of Independent Insurers, amicus curiae.

Bailey, Dixon, Wooten, McDonald & Fountain, Raleigh, for American Insurance Association, amicus curiae.

Plaintiff's petition to rehear. Denied.