Collins v. Davis, 321 S.E.2d 892 (N.C. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Collins v. Davis, 321 S.E.2d 892 (N.C. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Augustson v. Bank of America, N.A. (nced, 2012-03-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Augustson v. Bank of America, N.A.
E.D.N.C. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Under North Carolina law, unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine that allows for “the return of, or payment for, benefits received under circumstances where it would be unfair for the recipient to retain them without the contributor being repaid or compensated.” Rhue v. Rhue, 189 N.CApp. 299, 303-04, 658 S.E.2d 52, 57 (2008) (quotation omitted); see also Collins v. Davis, 68 N.CApp. 588, 591, 315 S.E.2d 759, 761 , offd, 312 N.C. 324 , 321 S.E.2d 892 (1984) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donald S. COLLINS
v.
Beverly Ann DAVIS (Williams).
359A84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 6, 1984.
321 S.E.2d 892
Per Curiam.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Tate, Young, Morphis, Bogle, Bach & Farthing by Thomas C. Morphis, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.

Randy D. Duncan, Hickory, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.