green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland
See Burrow v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 88 N.C.App. 347, 351 , 363 S.E.2d 215, 218 , disc. rev. denied, 322 N.C. 111 , 367 S.E.2d 910 (1988) and Smith v. Currie, 40 N.C.App. 739, 742 , 253 S.E.2d 645, 647 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 612 , 257 S.E.2d 219 (1979) (citation omitted) (issues of intent are "rarely susceptible to direct proof and almost always depends on inferences drawn from circumstantial evidence," therefore summary judgment is generally not appropriate when such an issue is involved, or where the evidence "`is subject to conflicting interpretations,' " or where reasonable pe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Will of Jones
(2×)
See also In the Matter of the Will of Everhart, 88 N.C.App. 572 , 574, 364 S.E.2d 173 , 174, disc. review denied, 322 N.C. 112 , 367 S.E.2d 910 , 911 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BURROW
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.
No. 68P88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 6, 1988.
Published
Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1988.