Smith v. Selco Prods., Inc., 393 S.E.2d 883 (N.C. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. Selco Prods., Inc., 393 S.E.2d 883 (N.C. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 · …a manufacturer does not completely discharge its duty to warn simply by providing some warnings of some dangerous propensity of its product at the time of sale. a continuing duty exists to provide post-sale warnings of any deficiencies it learns exist in the product ⚠ not in text
33 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia (md, 1992-02-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia (4×)
Md. · 1992 · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
a manufacturer does not completely discharge its duty to warn simply by providing some warnings of some dangerous propensity of its product at the time of sale. a continuing duty exists to provide post-sale warnings of any deficiencies it learns exist in the product
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SMITH
v.
SELCO PRODUCTS, INC.
No. 570P89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 10, 1990.
393 S.E.2d 883
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (4)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.