FORBES, III v. Par Ten Grp., Inc., 402 S.E.2d 824 (N.C. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
FORBES, III v. Par Ten Grp., Inc., 402 S.E.2d 824 (N.C. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Lakey (ncctapp, 2007-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lakey
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 99 N.C.App. 67 , 72, 392 S.E.2d 642 , 645 (1990) (holding that trial court could properly determine that evidence of a gun was relevant to the charge of possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine because "[a]s a practical matter, firearms are frequently involved for protection in the illegal drug trade"), cert. denied, 328 N.C. 96 , 402 S.E.2d 824 (1991); State v. Willis, 125 N.C.App. 537 , 543, 481 S.E.2d 407 , 411 (1997) (relying upon the "common-sense association of drugs and guns").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The News & Observer Publ'g Co. v. McCrory (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 8(c) (2015) ; see also Forbes v. Par Ten Group, Inc. , 99 N.C.App. 587 , 598, 394 S.E.2d 643 , 649 (1990) (noting that "failure to plead [an affirmative defense] is a bar to this issue being raised on appeal") (citation omitted), disc. review denied , 328 N.C. 89 , 402 S.E.2d 824 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ernest T. FORBES, III, David J. Drum and wife, Dorothy H. Drum, H.B. Stroup, Jr., and wife, Louise P. Stroup, et al
v.
The PAR TEN GROUP, INC., the Property Shop, Inc., Jan C. Mansson, William R. Lewis, Douglas R. Bebber, George W. Matthews.
477P90.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 10, 1991.
402 S.E.2d 824
Published

Harold K. Bennett, Ashville, for several defendants.

James Gary Rowe and Patricia L. Arcuri, Ashville, for plaintiffs.

Richmond G. Bernhardt, Jr., Greensboro, for NCAR.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Several Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of January 1991."

NCAR's motion for Leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Dismissed as moot. By order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of January 1991."