Braswell v. Braswell, 413 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Braswell v. Braswell, 413 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
74 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Isenhour v. Hutto (ncctapp, 1998-06-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Isenhour v. Hutto (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Braswell v. Braswell, 330 N.C. 363, 370-71 , 410 S.E.2d 897, 901 (1991), reh’g denied, 330 N.C. 854 , 413 S.E.2d 550 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" Hedrick v. Rains (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Braswell v. Braswell, 330 N.C. 363 , 410 S.E.2d 897 , reh’g denied, 330 N.C. 854 , 413 S.E.2d 550 (1992); Clark, 114 N.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re: West (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2026 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Braswell v. Braswell, 330 N.C. 363, 367 , 410 S.E.2d 897, 899 (1991), reh’g 8 IN RE WEST TYSON, J., dissenting denied, 330 N.C. 854 , 413 S.E.2d 550 (1992) (“The question presented on appeal is whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient to take the case to the jury.” (citing Hitchcock v. Cullerton, 82 N.C.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Jones v. Kearns (3×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Braswell v. Braswell, 330 N.C. 363, 370 , 410 S.E.2d 897, 901 (1991) (as a general rule police officers act for the public and therefore there is no liability for the failure to furnish police protection to specific individuals), reh’g denied, 330 N.C. 854 , 412 S.E.2d 550 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael Keith BRASWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Lillie Stancil Braswell, Deceased
v.
Billy R. BRASWELL and Ralph L. Tyson, Sheriff of Pitt County.
225A90.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 24, 1992.
413 S.E.2d 550
Published

Marvin Blount, Jr. and Joseph T. Edwards, Greenville, for plaintiff.

Richard T. Rice and J. Daniel McNatt, Winston-Salem, for defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 1992."