Whitaker v. Clark, 431 S.E.2d 31 (N.C. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Whitaker v. Clark, 431 S.E.2d 31 (N.C. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“services provided by local departments of social services are governmental functions to which governmental immunity applies.”
71 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Estate of Earley Ex Rel. Earley v. Haywood County Department of Social Services (ncctapp, 2010-06-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Estate of Earley Ex Rel. Earley v. Haywood County Department of Social Services (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
services provided by local departments of social services are governmental functions to which governmental immunity applies.
discussed Cited "see" Mellon v. Prosser (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whitaker v. Clark, 109 N.C.App. 379, 384 , 427 S.E.2d 142 , *442 145, disc. review denied and cert. denied, 333 N.C. 795 , 431 S.E.2d 31 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Taylor v. Brinkman, 108 N.C.App. 767 , 425 S.E.2d 429 , review denied, 333 N.C. 795 , 431 S.E.2d 30 (1993) ("... service of process attempted by registered or certified mail, as permitted by N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 4(j)(1)(c), is `complete on the day the summons and complaint are delivered to the address thereon'" (quoting Lynch v. Lynch 303 N.C. 367, 370 , 279 S.E.2d 840, 843 (1981)).
Ginger York WHITAKER, Administratrix of the Estate of Jonathan Wesley Whitaker
v.
Jim CLARK, Karen Smith and Judi Casterline.
137P93.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 3, 1993.
431 S.E.2d 31
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

E. Edward Vogler, Jr., Mocksville, and Beverly S. Murphy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff.

J. Daniel McNatt, Winston-Salem, for defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of June 1993."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of June 1993."