green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.3 score
“wjhere the trial court finds multiple grounds on which to base a termination of parental rights, and 'an appellate court determines there is at least one ground to support a conclusion that parental rights should be terminated, it is unnecessary to address the remaining grounds.”
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re S.C.R.
wjhere the trial court finds multiple grounds on which to base a termination of parental rights, and 'an appellate court determines there is at least one ground to support a conclusion that parental rights should be terminated, it is unnecessary to address the remaining grounds.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re SCR
here the trial court finds multiple grounds on which to base a termination of parental rights, and an appellate court determines there is at least one ground to support a conclusion that parental rights should be terminated, it is unnecessary to address the remaining grounds.
cited
Cited "see"
In re: C.L.S.
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 8, 618 S.E.2d 241 , 246 (2005) aff' d per curiam, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Djel
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1, 8 , 618 S.E.2d 241, 246 (2005) (citation omitted), aff'd per curiam, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re FGJ
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1, 8 , 618 S.E.2d 241, 246 (2005) (explaining that "where the trial court finds multiple grounds on which to base a termination of parental rights, and `an appellate court determines there is at least one ground to support a conclusion that parental rights should be terminated, it is unnecessary to address the remaining grounds'" (quoting In re Clark, 159 N.C.App. 75 , 78 n. 3, 582 S.E.2d 657 , 659 n. 3 (2003))), aff'd per curiam, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
In re D.B.
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 7, 618 S.E.2d 241 , 245 (2005), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re DB
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1, 7 , 618 S.E.2d 241, 245 (2005), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
In re L.B.
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 14, 618 S.E.2d 241 , 249 (2005), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re LB
See In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1, 14 , 618 S.E.2d 241, 249 (2005), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re D.D.J.
See In re P.L.P., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 618 S.E.2d 241 , 245 (2005) (holding that jurisdiction in the district court was "terminated by the trial court's order to `close' the case" and that DSS was required to file a new petition alleging neglect), aff'd per curiam, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DDJ
See In re P.L.P., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 618 S.E.2d 241, 245 (2005) (holding that jurisdiction in the district court was "terminated by the trial court's order to `close' the case" and that DSS was required to file a new petition alleging neglect), aff'd per curiam, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re C.T.
See, e.g., In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 618 S.E.2d 241 (2005), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re CT
See, e.g., In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 618 S.E.2d 241 (2005), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re J.N.S.
See, e.g., In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 618 S.E.2d 241 (2005) (Levinson, J.), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006) (affirming as to issues raised in dissent, which did not include the remedy, if any, for a trial court's failure to timely enter an order on termination of parental rights).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re JNS
See, e.g., In re P.L.P., 173 N.C.App. 1 , 618 S.E.2d 241 (2005) (Levinson, J.), aff'd, 360 N.C. 360 , 625 S.E.2d 779 (2006) (affirming as to issues raised in dissent, which did not include the remedy, if any, for a trial court's failure to timely enter an order on termination of parental rights).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Hardin Eli ROSS, III.
v.
Hardin Eli ROSS, III.
581A05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 3, 2006.
625 S.E.2d 779
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Rudy Renfer, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Parrish, Smith & Ramsey, LLP, by Richard D. Ramsey, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
[*780] Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.