green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Travis
See State v. Mello, 200 N.C.App. 437 , 438, 684 S.E.2d 483 , 485 (2009) (based on officer's training and experience, he believed he had witnessed hand-to-hand controlled substance transaction where two individuals in area known for illegal drug activity "approach[ed] the [defendant's] vehicle putting their hands into the vehicle"), aff'd per curiam, 364 N.C. 421 , 700 S.E.2d 224 (2010) ; State v. Carmon, 156 N.C.App. 235 , 240-41, 576 S.E.2d 730 , 735 (reasonable suspicion existed to conduct investigatory stop where (1) officer observed defendant in grocery store parking lot "receive a softbal…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Robert Peter VOGT, Jr.
v.
Robert Peter VOGT, Jr.
465A09.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 8, 2010.
700 S.E.2d 224
Per Curiam.
Published
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
William D. Auman, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Chief Justice PARKER and Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010).