neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.5 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State, Ex Rel. Joe Shelby Riley,
v.
Wm. M. Rowlett, of Tampa; Thos. W. Hutson, of Miami; S. E. Driskell, of Jacksonville; James E. Crump, of Winter Haven; H. a Day, of Orlando; J. M. Mann, of Lake Butler; Eugene G. Peek, of Ocala; C. E. Tumlin, of Miami; S. G Hollingsworth, of Bradenton; And J. D. Raborn, of Trenton
v.
Wm. M. Rowlett, of Tampa; Thos. W. Hutson, of Miami; S. E. Driskell, of Jacksonville; James E. Crump, of Winter Haven; H. a Day, of Orlando; J. M. Mann, of Lake Butler; Eugene G. Peek, of Ocala; C. E. Tumlin, of Miami; S. G Hollingsworth, of Bradenton; And J. D. Raborn, of Trenton
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 7, 1936.
Elmer R. Jones, for Relator;
John W. Prunty, for Respondents.
Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Davis, Brown.
Published
Per Curiam.
— In this case the record has been examined and the questions involved found to be identical with those raised in State of Florida, ex rel. Henry Sbordy, v. Wm. M. Rowlett, et al., decided January 15, 1936. It follows that the Writ of Prohibition must be and is hereby awarded on authority of the opinion and judgment in the last mentioned case.
It is' so ordered.
[*578] Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. Brown, J., dissents.