green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. State
See Flowers v. State, 152 Fla. 649 , 12 So.2d 772 (1943); Hudson v. State, 381 So.2d 344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirksey v. State
See Flowers v. State, 152 Fla. 649 , 12 So.2d 772 (1943) (Brown, J. dissenting on other grounds) (failure to comply with 901.17 would not necessarily render a free and voluntary confession inadmissible in evidence); and City of Miami v. Nelson, 186 So.2d 535, n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (fact that person to be arrested is not informed of the cause of the arrest until subsequent thereto does not necessarily deprive him of his rights); see also United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581 , 68 S.Ct. 222 , 92 L.Ed. 210 (1948) (decided on other grounds, but in dicta, espoused effective compliance); United Sta…
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See Flowers v. State, 1943, 152 Fla. 649 , 12 So.2d 772 ; City of Miami v. Nelson, 1966, Fla.App., 186 So.2d 535 .
cited
Cited "see"
Watson v. State
See Dees v. State, (1930), 99 Fla. 1144 , 128 So. 485 , and Flowers v. State, (1943), 152 Fla. 649 , 12 So.2d 772 .
cited
Cited "see"
City of Miami v. Nelson
See Flowers v. State, 152 Fla. 649 , 12 So.2d 772 ; Turner v. State, Fla. 1954, 74 So.2d 891 ; Romanello v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 160 So.2d 529 .
cited
Cited "see"
Daugherty v. State
See Flowers v. State, 152 Fla. 649 , 12 So. (2nd) 772 , and the many leading cases cited therein.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank H. Rodriguez
v.
State of Florida
v.
State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 6, 1943.
Edwin R. Dickenson, for appellant.
J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Woodrow M. Melvin and John C. Wynn, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Buford, Terrell, Chapman, Adams.
Published
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of embezzlement. All questions presented have been duly considered and the judgment is affirmed.
BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.