green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
WAKEMAN GRIFFIN GRIBBEL, Et Al., as Executors, Etc.,
v.
T. N. HENDERSON JR., Et Al.
v.
T. N. HENDERSON JR., Et Al.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jul 16, 1943.
Carl T. Hoffman, L.L. Robinson, Sam C. Matthews, and J. Lewis Hall, for petitioners.
Tillman Henderson, and Mabry, Reaves, Carlton White, for respondents.
Terrell, Brown, Chapman, Thomas, Adams, Buford, Sebring.
Published
Lead Opinion
ON REHEARING GRANTED
PER CURIAM:A rehearing having been granted and the Court having heard oral argument and further considered the record and briefs, it is ordered that we now adhere tó our former judgment.
[*398] TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur. ' BUFORD, C. J., dissents. SEBRING, J., not participating.Dissent
BUFORD, C. J.,
dissenting:
On reconsideration of this case, I do not think that the allegations of the bill of complaint are sufficient to show chat the defendant-Executors under the Gribbel will are barred from pleading the statute of non-claim. It is my opinion that the plea of non-claim either presented an issue with the burden of proof on the defendant, or else presented a condition requiring amendments to the bill of complaint as replications are no longer available.
So the order striking the plea should be quashed.