green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Berman
Canal Authority v. Litzel, 243 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1970), also a necessity case, used the phrase "gross abuse of discretion." We are aware that Sibley v. Volusia County, 147 Fla. 256 , 2 So.2d 578, 582 (1941), contains a concurring opinion in which three other justices concurred which said: Where the legislature delegates the powers of eminent domain to an administrative agency of government, or to a quasi public corporation, it may also delegate the power to determine the necessity for making the particular improvement for such public purpose, and generally such determination will not be disturbe…
cited
Cited "see"
Rawls v. Leon County
See Sibley v. Volusia County, 147 Fla. 256 , 2 So.2d 578 (1941).
cited
Cited "see"
Tosohatchee Game Pres. v. Central & So. Fla. Fl. CD
See Sibley v. Volusia County, 1941, 147 Fla. 256 , 2 So.2d 578 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc.
(2×)
See Sibley v. Volusia County, 1941, 147 Fla. 302 , 2 So.2d 578 .
cited
Cited "see"
Shavers v. Duval County
See Sibley v. Volusia County, 147 Fla. 256 , 2 So.2d 578 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State Ex Rel. Walter Zysk
v.
C. J. Woodruff, as Chief of Police of the City of Tampa, a Municipality, Etc.
v.
C. J. Woodruff, as Chief of Police of the City of Tampa, a Municipality, Etc.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 27, 1941.
Bryan Bryan, for Petitioner;
Alonzo B. McMullen, Ralph A. Marsicano and M. Henry Cohen,
for Respondent.
Terrell, Brown, Whitfield, Buford, Chapman, Thomas.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Lead Opinion
Terrell, J.
The records and the briefs in this case have been examined and the questions raised found to be identical with those raised in State ex rel William Hough v. C. J. Woodruff, decided this date, so the petitioner is discharged on authority of last cited case.
Whitfield, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur. [*303] Brown, C. J., and Thomas, J., dissents.Dissent
Thomas, J.
(dissenting). — I am unable to agree with the opinion of a majority of the Court because I feel that there is no basis in the record for a writ of habeas corpus.
Brown, C. J., concurs.