green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.
LEXIS 253, at *5-6; Dowling v. Slotnik, 712 A.2d at 404 , 244 Conn. at 796 [1998]; Gene’s Harvesting v. Rodriguez, 421 So.2d 701, 701 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982), 1982 Fla.App.
cited
Cited "see"
Mendoza v. Monmouth Recycling Corp.
See Gene's Harvesting v. Rodriguez, 421 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fernandez-Lopez v. Jose Cervino, Inc.
See Gene's Harvesting v. Rodriguez, 421 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Veliz v. Rental Service Corp. USA, Inc.
Corp. v. Candelo, 478 So.2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); see also Gene’s Harvesting v. Rodriguez, 421 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Safeharbor Employer Services I, Inc. v. Velazquez
See Cenvill Development Corp. v. Candelo, 478 So.2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); see also Gene's Harvesting v. Rodriguez, 421 So.2d 701, 701 (Fla. 1st *986 DCA 1982) (holding fact that workers' compensation claimant was illegal alien did not preclude entitlement to benefits for work-related injury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cenvill Development Corp. v. Candelo
See, also Gene's Harvesting v. Rodriquez, 421 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982) (holding that claimant who was an alien illegally in the country was not precluded from benefits for work related injury).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GENE's HARVESTING and Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Co., Appellants,
v.
Jesus RODRIGUEZ, a/K/a Augustine Tassaint, Appellee.
v.
Jesus RODRIGUEZ, a/K/a Augustine Tassaint, Appellee.
AJ-166.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 9, 1982.
421 So. 2d 701
Robert P. Smith, Jr..
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
James M. Hess of Driscoll, Langston & Kane, Orlando, for appellants.
Thomas R. Mooney of Meyers, Mooney, Adler & Hammond, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.
We affirm the deputy's order finding that appellee, an alien illegally in this country, is entitled to Chapter 440 benefits for a work-related injury notwithstanding his immigration status. Section 440.02(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1980 Supp.), specifically included aliens among those "employees" entitled to benefits, and nothing in the statute suggests that workers not lawfully immigrated are excluded. See White v. Conoley Fruit Harvesting, Inc., IRC Order 2-3877 (1979). Appellants' other points have no merit.
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.