cited Cited "see" Parish of Livingston v. A&M Investment Properties, LLC See State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Nelken, 628 So. 2d 1279, 1282 ( La.App. 3 Cir. 1993), writ denied, 634 So. 2d 860 ( La. 1994).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bridges v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. See also Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hospital, 630 So.2d 861 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993), writ denied, 634 So.2d 860 (La.1994); Wilson v. State DHHR, 628 So.2d 1164 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1993); Williams v. Charity Hospital, 499 So.2d 1260 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986). [1] In Dibos v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc., 622 So.2d 677, 680 (La.App. 4th Cir.1993), this Court held that the papers supporting the position for the party moving for the summary judgment are to be closely scrutinized while the opposing papers are to be indulgently treated, in determining whether mover has satisfied his burden.