Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 280 U.S. 603 (1929). · Go Syfert
Search
Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 280 U.S. 603 (1929). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith Ex Rel. Estate of Smith v. Commissioner (ca5, 1999-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1934 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1934 1980 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Smith Ex Rel. Estate of Smith v. Commissioner
5th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See 88 T.C. 769, 779-783 , 1987 WL 49299 (1987), rev’d 856 F.2d 1158 (8th Cir.1988). 30 . 856 F.2d 1158 , 1161. 31 . 34 F.2d 233 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 603 , 50 S.Ct. 85 , 74 L.Ed. 647 (1929). 32 .
cited Cited "see" Propstra v. United States
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jacobs v. Commissioner, 34 F.2d 233 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 603 , 50 S.Ct. 85 , 74 L.Ed. 647 (1929).
discussed Cited "see" John A. Propstra, Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur E. Price v. United States of America, John A. Propstra, Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur E. Price v. United States (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jacobs v. Commissioner, 34 F.2d 233 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 603 , 50 S.Ct. 85 , 74 L.Ed. 647 (1929).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Taylor v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1962 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jacobs v. Commissioner , 34 F. 2d 233 , 235 , 236 (C.A. 8, 1929), affirming 9 B.T.A. 636 (1927) , certiorari denied 280 U.S. 603 (1929) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha
v.
Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
No. 455.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1929.
280 U.S. 603
Messrs. George C. Sprague and George W. Betts, Jr.f for petitioner., Messrs. Henry M. Longley and Ezra G. Benedict Fox for respondent.
Published

Petition! for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.