Carl Green v. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Ry. Co.., 294 U.S. 715 (1935). · Go Syfert
Search
Carl Green v. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Ry. Co.., 294 U.S. 715 (1935). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Orvner D. Biggs v. Norfolk Dredging Company, Samuel J. Clowers v. Tidewater-Raymond-Kiewit (ca4, 1966-03-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1935 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1935 1980 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Orvner D. Biggs v. Norfolk Dredging Company, Samuel J. Clowers v. Tidewater-Raymond-Kiewit
4th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hoffman v. New York, N.H. & H.R.R., 74 F.2d 227 (2 Cir. 1934), cert. den., 294 U.S. 715 , 55 S.Ct. 513 , 79 L.Ed. 1248 ; Smith v. Service Contracting, Inc., 236 F.Supp. 492, 495 (E.D.La.1964); Pritt v. West Virginia N.R.R., 132 W.Va. 184 , 51 S.E.2d 105 , 6 A.L.R.2d 562 (1948), cert. den., 336 U.S. 961 , 69 S.Ct. 891 , 93 L.Ed. 1113 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carl Green
v.
The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago, and St. Louis Railway Company.
688.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1935.
294 U.S. 715
Published

294 U.S. 715

55 S.Ct. 516

79 L.Ed. 1249

Carl GREEN, petitioner,
v.
The CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, and ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY.[*]

No. 688.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 18, 1935

1

Mr. Carl Green, pro se.

2

For opinion below, see 126 Ohio St. 512, 186 N. E. 365, 87 A. L. R. 1268.

3

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

*

Rehearing denied 294 U. S. 734, 55 S. Ct. 551, 79 L. Ed.