Purity Inv. Co. v. McLaughlin, 295 U.S. 753 (1935). · Go Syfert
Purity Inv. Co. v. McLaughlin, 295 U.S. 753 (1935). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Rubin (ca3, 1967-06-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In re Rubin
3rd Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 76 F.2d 209 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 295 U.S. 753 , 55 S.Ct. 834 , 79 L.Ed. 1697 (1935).
cited Cited "see" In the Matter of Herman Rubin, Individually and Herman Rubin as Surviving and Liquidating Partner of Rubin's Pastries, a Partnership, Debtor. Jules Goldstein, Henry Glazer, Philip Abrams, Bernard Kaufman and Joseph Bibbo
3rd Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 76 F.2d 209 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 295 U.S. 753 , 55 S.Ct. 834 , 79 L.Ed. 1697 (1935).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Purity Investment Co.
v.
McLaughlin, Collector of Internal Revenue
No. 873.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1935.
295 U.S. 753
Mr. Charles C. Sullivan for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, and Messrs. James W. Morris and Alexander F. Prescott, Jr., for respondent.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.