Catherine Schultz v. Live Stock Nat'l Bank of Chicago, Adm'r, Etc., 302 U.S. 766 (1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Catherine Schultz v. Live Stock Nat'l Bank of Chicago, Adm'r, Etc., 302 U.S. 766 (1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “As bearing on his credibility, a witness may be cross-examined as to inconsistent acts or conduct generally, acts or conduct inconsistent with his testimony, or omissions on his part which tend to discredit him.”
19 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Hill (pa, 1995-09-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Hill
Pa. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
as bearing on his credibility, a witness may be cross-examined as to inconsistent acts or conduct generally, acts or conduct inconsistent with his testimony, or omissions on his part which tend to discredit him.
cited Cited "see" Wallace & Tiernan Products, Inc. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.
W.D. Pa. · 1944 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wett-Laufer v. Robins, 2 Cir., 1937, 92 F.2d 573 , certiorari denied, 302 U.S. 766 , 58 S.Ct. 477 , 82 L.Ed. 594 ; Minnesota Mining & Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Catherine Schultz
v.
Live Stock National Bank of Chicago, Administrator, Etc.
671.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1938.
302 U.S. 766
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (1)

302 U.S. 766

58 S.Ct. 481

82 L.Ed. 595

Catherine SCHULTZ, petitioner,
v.
LIVE STOCK NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Administrator, etc.[*]

No. 671.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 17, 1938

1

Miss Catherine Schultz, pro se.

2

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of the State of Illinois, First District.

3

For opinion below, see 289 Ill.App. 626, 7 N.E.2d 636.

4

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

*

Rehearing denied 303 U.S. 666, 58 S.Ct. 609, 82 L.Ed. ——; 304 U.S. ——, 58 S.Ct. 1052, 82 L.Ed. ——; 305 U.S. ——, 59 S.Ct. 98, 83 L.Ed. ——.