green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941
1983
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Baum
improperly to influence function of the prosecuting attorney would be a very successful way of impeding and obstructing the judge himself.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred H. Harmsen, and v. C. Arnholt Smith, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of United States National Bank, in Intervention and v. C. Arnholt Smith, And
See Kimmich v. Potter, 112 F.2d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 653 , 61 S.Ct. 47 , 85 L.Ed. 418 (1940), reh. denied, 313 U.S. 597 , 61 S.Ct. 832 , 85 L.Ed. 1550 (1941); Davis v. McFarland, 15 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1926), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 754 , 47 S.Ct. 457 , 71 L.Ed. 875 (1927); Denicke v. Anglo Calif.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harmsen v. Smith
See Kimmich v. Potter, 112 F.2d 135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 653 , 61 S.Ct. 47 , 85 L.Ed. 418 (1940), reh. denied, 313 U.S. 597 , 61 S.Ct. 832 , 85 L.Ed. 1550 (1941); Davis v. McFarland, 15 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1926), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 754 , 47 S.Ct. 457 , 71 L.Ed. 875 (1927); Denicke v. Anglo Calif.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Proceedings Against Suffolk County District Court Judge Floyd Sarisohn
See United States v. Polakoff, 112 F. 2d 888, 889 (2 Cir. 1940), cert, denied 311 U. S. 653 , 61 S. Ct. 41 , 85 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mack S. Tane
(2×)
See United States v. Polakoff, 112 F.2d 888, 889 (2 Cir. 1940), cert. denied 311 U.S. 653 , 61 S.Ct. 41 , 85 L.Ed. 418 (1940).
discussed
Cited "see"
John B. Monroe v. United States of America, George C. Prather v. United States of America, Roger W. Simkins v. United States of America, Curtis M. Taylor v. United States of America, Albert H. Smith v. United States of America, Charles Anderson v. United States of America, Burnie King v. United States
See United States v. Polakoff, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 888 , 134 A.L.R. 607 , certiorari denied 311 U.S. 653 , 61 S.Ct. 41 , 85 L.Ed. 418 ; Reitmeister v. Reitmeister, 2 Cir., 162 F.2d 691 ; Flanders v. United States, 6 Cir., 222 F.2d 163 ; United States v. Yee Ping Jong, D.C.W.D.Pa., 26 F.Supp. 69 ; United States v. Lewis, D.C.D.D.C., 87 F. Supp. 970 , reversed on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Monroe v. United States
See United States v. Polakoff, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 888 , 134 A.L.R. 607 , certiorari denied 311 U.S. 653 , 61 S.Ct. 41 , 85 L.Ed. 418 ; Reitmeister v. Reitmeister, 2 Cir., 162 F.2d 691 ; Flanders v. United States, 6 Cir., 222 F.2d 163 ; United States v. Yee Ping Jong, D.C.W.D.Pa., 26 F.Supp. 69 ; United States v. Lewis, D.C.D.D.C., 87 F.Supp. 970 , reversed on other grounds sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albers, Receiver
v.
Farley
v.
Farley
No. 271.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1940.
Messrs. Homer D. Dines and Llewellyn A. Dace for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Thdmas E. Harris for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.