green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Klass
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
Distilling Co. v. United States, 6 Cir., 1946, 153 F.2d 353, 361 , certiorari denied Gould v. United States, 328 U.S. 848 , 66 S.Ct. 1120 , 90 L.Ed. 1622 , holds otherwise where the trial court in its discretion allows the contradiction; but see Simon v. United States, 4 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 80, 85 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 412 , 86 L.Ed. 555 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ranking Smith, A/K/A Rockhead, A/K/A Rakeem, A/K/A Raking, A/K/A Kevin Smith, United States of America v. William Daniels, A/K/A Lord
See Simon v. United States, 123 F.2d 80, 83 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 694 (1941).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See Simon v. United States, 123 F.2d 80, 83 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 694 (1941).
cited
Cited "see"
Hurwitz v. Kohm
See, generally, Hawkinson v. Johnston, 122 F.2d 724 (8th Cir. 1941), cert. den. 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 365 , 86 L.Ed. 555 ; 49 Am.Jur.2d § 178.
cited
Cited "see"
Monarch Industrial Corp. v. American Motorists Insurance
See Hammond-Knowlton v. United States, 121 F.2d 192, 193 (2d Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 410 , 86 L.Ed. 555 (1941).
discussed
Cited "see"
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.
To treat “profits” as the twin of “damages” in this case is to join “the ghostly company of legal fictions.” Maitland, “English Law And The Renaissance” (1901), reprinted in Delany, The Frederic William Maitland Reader 227 (1957); see Hammond-Knowlton v. United States, 121 F.2d 192, 199-200 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 410 , 86 L.Ed. 555 (1941) (a critique of fictions in the law).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard L. Phillips v. United States
See Hammond-Knowlton v. United States, 121 F.2d 192, 204-205 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 410 , 86 L.Ed. 555 (1941).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Di Candia
See, United States v. Rosenberg, 2 Cir., 195 F.2d 583 , 594 citing with approval Simon v. United States, 4 Cir., 123 F.2d 80, 83 , certiorari denied, 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 412 , 86 L.Ed. 555 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1993
National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co. v. 4010 Washington, Inc., 434 S.W.2d 757, 763-64 (Mo. Ct. App. 1968) (holding that lease was not cancelled because lessee failed to pay penalty prior to cancellation as required by the lease); see also Hawkinson v. Johnston, 122 F.2d 724, 732 (8th Cir.) (holding that termination provisions must be "fully complied with"), cert. denied, 314 U. S. 694 , 62 S. Ct. 365 (1941).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Crisp v. Nursing Homes, Inc.
See also Simon v. United States, 123 F.2d 80 (4th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 694 , 86 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Callaway v. Axtell
However, the theory .announced by District Judge Cavanah is the same as that which was subsequently announced by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp, 1941, 314 U.S. 212 , 62 S.Ct. 232 , 86 L.Ed. 159 ; see also United States v. American Packing & Provision Co. (10 Cir.1941), 122 F.2d 445 , cert. den. 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 364 , 86 L.Ed. 555 ; Compare J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosenberg
See, e. g., Simon v. United States, 4 Cir., 123 F.2d 80, 83 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 412 , 86 L.Ed. 555 : “It cannot be too often repeated, or too strongly emphasized, that the function of a federal trial judge is not that of an umpire or of a moderator at a town meeting.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosenberg
See, e. g., Simon v. United States, 4 Cir., 123 F.2d 80, 83 , certiorari denied 314 U.S. 694 , 62 S.Ct. 412 , 86 L.Ed. 555 : "It cannot be too often repeated, or too strongly emphasized, that the function of a federal trial judge is not that of an umpire or of a moderator at a town meeting.
American Packing & Provision Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 735.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1941.
Messrs. J. H. DeVine, J. A. Howell, and Neil R. Olmstead for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy for the United States.
Cited by 94 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.