green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Morgan v. United States
See United States v. Walker, 176 F.2d 564, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 239 , 94 L.Ed. 547 (1949); United States v. Mitchell, supra at 1008; McCormick on Evidence §§ 66, 84 (2d ed. 1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caci
See United States v. Walker, 176 F.2d 564, 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 239 , 94 L.Ed. 547 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Caci
See United States v. Walker, 176 F.2d 564, 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 239 , 94 L.Ed. 547 (1949). 40 The instruction that the defendants need not have intended to affect commerce in order to be guilty was entirely correct.
cited
Cited "see"
District of Columbia National Bank, Washington v. District of Columbia
See Hamilton National Bank v. District of Columbia, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 109 , 176 F.2d 624 , cert. denied, 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 241 , 94 L.Ed. 547 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walker
See *290 United States v. Walker, 2 Cir., 176 F.2d 564, 566 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 239 , 94 L.Ed. 547 ; United States v. Leviton, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 848, 853 , certiorari denied 343 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 860 ; In re Fried, 2 Cir., 161 F.2d 453 , 1 A.L.R.2d 996 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Paper Company v. The Inhabitants of the Town of Jay, Maine, Appeal of State of Maine
See also Hamilton Nat’l Bank v. District of Columbia, 176 F.2d 624 , 630 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.) (section 2403(a) does not apply to local laws of the District of Columbia), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 241 , 94 L.Ed. 547 (1949); Robbins v. Lady Baltimore Foods, Inc., 678 F.Supp. 1323 , 1329 n. 2 (N.D.Ill.1987) (section 2403(a) does not apply to provisions “enacted solely to satisfy parochial desires”), reversed in part on other grounds, 868 F.2d 258 (7th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
District of Columbia
v.
Hamilton National Bank of Washington
v.
Hamilton National Bank of Washington
No. 385.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1949.
Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray, George C. Updegraff and Harry L. Walker for petitioner. Roger J. Whiteford, John J. Wilson and Philip S. Peyser for respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.