green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Windrem v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Dry Dock and Repair Yard, Inc., 306 F.2d 369, 371-372 (5th Cir. 1962): After Davis, two per curiam decisions indicated that the Supreme Court intended the “twilight zone” “to include within a wide circle of doubt all waterfront cases involving aspects pertaining both to the land and to the sea where a reasonable argument can be made either way.” Moore’s [sic] Case, 1948, 323 Mass. 162 , 80 N.E.2d 478, 481 , aff’d, Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moore [sic], 1948, 335 U.S. 874 , 69 S.Ct. 239 , 93 L.Ed. 417 , and Kaiser Company v. Baskin, 1950, 340 U.S. 886 , 71 S.Ct. 208 , 95 L.Ed. 643 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Arp v. Maryland Casualty Company
In Davis a structural steel worker engaged in dismantling a bridge across a navigable river was stowing dismantled steel in a barge when he fell from the barge and was drowned. * * *" * * * * * * "After Davis, two per curiam decisions indicated that the Supreme Court intended the `twilight zone' `to include within a wide circle of doubt all waterfront cases involving aspects pertaining both to the land and to the sea where a reasonable argument can be made either way. ' Moore's Case, 1948, 323 Mass. 162 , 80 N.E.2d 478, 481 , aff'd, Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moore, 1948, 335 U.S. 874 , 69 S.Ct. 2…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Holland v. Harrison Bros. Dry Dock & Repair Yard, Inc.
After Davis, two per curiam decisions indicated that the Supreme Court intended the “twilight zone” “to include within a wide circle of doubt all waterfront cases involving aspects pertaining both to the land and to the sea where a reasonable argument can be made either way.” Moore’s Case, 1948, 323 Mass. 162 , 80 N.E.2d 478, 481 , aff’d, Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moore, 1948, 335 U.S. 874 , 69 S.Ct. 239 , 93 L.Ed. 417 and Baskin v. Industrial Acc. Comm., 1950, 340 U.S. 886 , 71 S.Ct. 204 , 95 L.Ed. 643 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Holland v. Harrison Brothers Dry Dock And Repair Yard, Inc.
The conclusion that the Longshoremen's Act might have applied without regard to whether the situation might be `maritime but local' plainly implies a rejection of any reading of § 3(a) to exclude coverage in such situation." 82 S.Ct. 1196 . 8 After Davis, two per curiam decisions indicated that the Supreme Court intended the "twilight zone" "to include within a wide circle of doubt all waterfront cases involving aspects pertaining both to the land and to the sea where a reasonable argument can be made either way." Moore's Case, 1948, 323 Mass. 162 , 80 N.E.2d 478, 481 , aff'd, Bethlehem Steel…
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter W. Makarewicz v. Palmer C. Scafati, Superintendent of the Massachusetts Correctionalinstitution at Walpole, Massachusetts
Under Massachusetts law the denial of a writ of error can be appealed to the full bench of the Supreme Judicial Court on the grounds that “the single justice abused his powers or that his action was arbitrary and unjustifiable.” Commonwealth v. Sacco, 261 Mass. 12, 17 , 158 N.E. 167, 169 , cert. denied. 275 U.S. 574 , 48 S.Ct. 17 , 72 L.Ed. 434 (1927); accord, McGarty v. Commonwealth, 326 Mass. 413, 414-415 , 95 N.E.2d 158, 159 , cert. denied, 340 U.S. 886 , 71 S.Ct. 199 , 95 L.Ed. 643 (1950).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clyde Flowers v. The Travelers Insurance Company
See also Kaiser Co., Inc. v. Baskin, 340 U.S. 886 , 71 S.Ct. 208 , 95 *226 L.Ed. 643, affirming 89 Cal.App.2d 632 , 201 P.2d 549 . 16 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGarty
v.
Massachusetts
v.
Massachusetts
No. 253.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 25, 1950.
340 U.S. 886
William C. Crossley for petitioner.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. The motion for a stay of execution of sentence of death is denied. Certiorari denied.